Empire Level Manufacturing Corp. v. Toolrich Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 32

ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED that the 31 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Preliminary Injunction 25 is hereby dissolved and the related cash bond is released. See Order for further specifications. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/3/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; cc: Finance - AF)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 EMPIRE LEVEL MANUFACTURING CORP., 5 6 7 Plaintiff, vs. TOOLRICH IMP. & EXP. CO, LTD., et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-00718-GMN-CWH ORDER ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 11 Judge Carl W. Hoffman, Jr., (ECF No. 31), which recommends that Plaintiff Empire Level 12 Manufacturing Corp.’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 28) be GRANTED. 13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 14 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1–4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 15 D. Nev. R. IB 3–2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 16 determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, 17 or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3–2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is 19 not required to conduct “any review at all ... of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” 20 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 21 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where 22 no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 23 (9th Cir. 2003). 24 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. Accordingly, 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) is Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED to the extent that it is not inconsistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Empire Level Manufacturing Corp.’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, their agents, representatives and any 5 other person acting in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined from further 6 use, in connection with a level, of the infringing trademark and trade dress or any other 7 trademark confusingly similar to the Empire trademark (United States Trademark Registration 8 No. 2,833,616) or trade dress which is a colorable imitation of the Empire trademark and/or 9 trade dress. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that Defendants, their agents, representatives and 11 any other person acting in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined from 12 further use of any promotional materials, including without limitation displays on Defendants’ 13 websites, including the infringing trademark or trade dress. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 15 USC § 1125(b), United States 15 Customs shall refuse entry into the United States and seize any products of Defendants bearing 16 an infringing trademark and/or trade dress. 17 18 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall deliver up for destruction all infringing products in the United States to which they hold title, if any. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall deliver up for destruction all 20 catalogs, literature, advertising, negatives, photographs and other materials in the United States 21 in the possession or under the control of Defendants bearing representations of the infringing 22 trademark and/or trade dress. 23 24 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Preliminary Injunction (See ECF No. 25) is hereby dissolved and the related cash bond is released. DATED this 3rd day of June, 2015. ________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?