Tyus et al v. Wendy's of Las Vegas, Inc. et al

Filing 83

ORDER Granting 82 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 76 Renewed MOTION to Certify Class. Defendant Wendy's of Las Vegas, Inc.'s Responses due by 5/29/2017. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:14-cv-00729-GMN-VCF Document 82 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ., Bar # 3192
ROGER GRANDGENETT, ESQ., Bar #6323
MONTGOMER Y. PAEK, ESQ., Bar # 10176
KATHRYN B. BLAKEY, ESQ., Bar # 12701
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
Telephone:
702.862.8800
Fax No.:
702.862.8811
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
WENDY’S OF LAS VEGAS, INC. and
CEDAR ENTERPRISES, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13

LATONYA TYUS, et al.,

14

Plaintiffs,

15

vs.

16

WENDY’S OF LAS VEGAS, INC., et al.,

17

Defendants.

18

Case No. 2:14-cv-00729-GMN-VCF
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
TEMPORARY STAY OF BRIEFING
DEADLINES OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE
STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING
DEADLINES
(FIRST REQUEST)

19
20

Plaintiffs Latonya Tyus, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Wendy's of Las Vegas, Inc.,

21

(“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to extend the deadline for

22

Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Class Certification [ECF No. 76]. up to and

23

including May 29, 2017.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 H oward Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800

Case 2:14-cv-00729-GMN-VCF Document 82 Filed 05/11/17 Page 2 of 2

1

This is the first extension of Defendant’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Renewed Motion

2

for Class Certification and is made in good faith by stipulation of the parties. This extension is

3

needed due to Defense counsel’s current work load which has included several mediations, witness

4

interviews, and previously scheduled court deadlines. Accordingly, in order to provide a full and

5

proper substantive response to Plaintiff’s Motion, the requested two-week extension is necessary.

6
7

Dated: May 11, 2016

8
9
10
11
12
13

/s/ Bradley Schrager, Esq.
DON SPRINGMEYER, ESQ.
BRADLEY SCHRAGER, ESQ.
DANIEL BRAVO, ESQ.
WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO,
SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLC

/s/ Kathryn B. Blakey, Esq.
RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ.
ROGER GRANDGENETT, ESQ.
MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ.
KATHRYN B. BLAKEY, ESQ.
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Attorneys for Defendants

14
ORDER

15
16

ITS IS SO ORDERED:

17

12
Dated: May ______, 2017

18
19
20

Firmwide:147586058.1 029931.1008

_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 H oward Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800

2.