Nevada Association Services, Inc. v. Tumanan et al
Filing
67
ORDER granting 66 Motion to dismiss party based on the disclaimer of interest. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
Case 2:14-cv-00733-JCM-NJK Document 66 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 4
1
TAMARA W. ASHFORD
Acting Assistant Attorney General
2
3
4
5
VIRGINIA CRONAN LOWE
Trial Attorney, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 683
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0683
Telephone: (202) 307-6484
6
8
Of Counsel:
DANIEL BOGDEN
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
9
Attorneys for the United States of America
7
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.,
a Nevada corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
RAMON TUMANAN, an individual;
CHARITY TUMANAN, an individual;
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. “MERS”
a corporation state of incorporation unknown;
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign
corporation registered in Delaware; KEY
BANK, N.A., a business organization form
unknown and state of registration unknown;
REPUBLIC MORTGAGE, LLC, a Nevada
Limited Liability Company; U.S. BANK, N.A.,
c/o BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
on information and belief, a foreign limited
partnership registered in Texas; REPUBLIC
SERVICES, a business organization form
unknown; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a
public entity; and DOES 1-25, inclusive;
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
) Civil No. 2:14-cv-00733 -JCM-NJK
)
) UNITED STATES’ DISCLAIMER OF INTEREST
) IN INTERPLEAD FUND, REQUEST FOR
INTERPLED
) DISMISSAL AS A PARTY TO THIS ACTION,
) AND [Proposed] ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
25
The United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, sets forth the following:
26
1. Plaintiff brought this suit to interplead excess proceeds from the sale of real property located at
27
6342 Flotilla Ave, Las Vegas, NV, 89139, pursuant to a non-judicial trustee’s sale and to determine the
28
Case 2:14-cv-00733-JCM-NJK Document 66 Filed 12/17/14 Page 2 of 4
1
respective claims to the excess proceeds.
2
2. As set forth in the United States’ Answer and Claim (Doc. #9), a Notice of Federal Tax Lien was
3
recorded with the Clark County Recorder against Defendants Ramon Tumanan and Charity Tumanan for
4
federal income tax liabilities for the year 2007 on June 21, 2012.
5
6
3. The United States disclaims any interest in the interplead excess proceeds pursuant to the Notice
of Federal Tax Lien set forth in paragraph 2, above.
7
8
4. Based on the forgoing disclaimer of interest, the United States respectfully requests that it be
dismissed as a party from this action.
Dated this 17th day of December, 2014.
9
10
11
TAMARA W. ASHFORD
Acting Assistant Attorney General
12
/s/ Virginia Cronan Lowe
VIRGINIA CRONAN LOWE
Trial Attorney, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
Post Office Box 683
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: (202) 307-6484
13
14
15
16
17
Of Counsel:
DANIEL BOGDEN
United States Attorney
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated:
December 22, 2014
24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:14-cv-00733-JCM-NJK Document 66 Filed 12/17/14 Page 3 of 4
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
3
4
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that service of the foregoing UNITED STATES’ DISCLAIMER
5
OF INTEREST IN INTERPLEAD FUND, REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AS A PARTY TO THIS
6
ACTION, AND [Proposed] ORDER has been made this 17th day of December, 2014, by using the
7
Court’s CM/ECF system to:
8
9
Richard Vilkin Esq. at richard@vilkinlaw.com, vilkinlaw@cox.net
10
Steven G. Shevorski, Esq. at steven.shevorski@akerman.com
11
Diana S. Cline at diana@hkimlaw.com
12
Ariel E. Stern at ariel.stern@ackerman.com
13
Michael J. Lemcool at michaellemcool@gmail.com
14
15
16
/s/ Virginia Cronan Lowe
VIRGINIA CRONAN LOWE
Trial Attorney, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Case 2:14-cv-00733-JCM-NJK Document 66 Filed 12/17/14 Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?