King v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER that each attorney of record in this matter to file a certification with the Court no later than August 1, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-4 and 26-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/25/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 DEBORAH A. KING, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC. 14 Defendant. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-00751-JCM-NJK ORDER 16 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling 17 Order. Docket No. 18. The proposed discovery plan misstates the requirements of Local Rule 26-4, 18 in that it provides that requests to extend deadlines in the scheduling order need only be filed 20 days 19 before the discovery cut-off. See id., at 3. Local Rule 26-4 requires that any request to extend 20 deadlines set forth in the scheduling order must be submitted at least 21 days before the subject 21 deadline. For example, any request to extend the deadline for initial expert disclosures must be filed 22 at least 21 days before the expiration of that deadline. Such a request filed only 20 days before the 23 discovery cut-off would be untimely. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 In an effort to ensure future compliance and complete understanding of the Local Rules, the 2 Court hereby ORDERS each attorney of record1 in this matter to file a certification with the Court no 3 later than August 1, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-4 and 26-1. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: July 25, 2014. 6 7 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 26 27 28 This includes Jocelyn Michele Shelton, Deanna L. Forbush, Joshua D. Brinen, and Sean P. Flanagan. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?