King v. Standard Metals Processing, Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER that each attorney of record in this matter to file a certification with the Court no later than August 1, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-4 and 26-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/25/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
DEBORAH A. KING,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC.
14
Defendant.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:14-cv-00751-JCM-NJK
ORDER
16
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling
17
Order. Docket No. 18. The proposed discovery plan misstates the requirements of Local Rule 26-4,
18
in that it provides that requests to extend deadlines in the scheduling order need only be filed 20 days
19
before the discovery cut-off. See id., at 3. Local Rule 26-4 requires that any request to extend
20
deadlines set forth in the scheduling order must be submitted at least 21 days before the subject
21
deadline. For example, any request to extend the deadline for initial expert disclosures must be filed
22
at least 21 days before the expiration of that deadline. Such a request filed only 20 days before the
23
discovery cut-off would be untimely.
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
In an effort to ensure future compliance and complete understanding of the Local Rules, the
2
Court hereby ORDERS each attorney of record1 in this matter to file a certification with the Court no
3
later than August 1, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-4 and 26-1.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: July 25, 2014.
6
7
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
26
27
28
This includes Jocelyn Michele Shelton, Deanna L. Forbush, Joshua D. Brinen, and Sean P.
Flanagan.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?