Gayler v. High Desert State Prison et al
Filing
107
ORDER re Movant Charles Wirth's 106 Reply in support of his 103 Motion to Join. The Court finds no cause to withdraw or amend the 105 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BRANDY GAYLER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )
Case No. 2:14-cv-00769-APG-CWH
ORDER
Presently before the Court is Movant Charles Wirth’s reply (ECF No. 106) in support of his
11
motion to join, filed on May 18, 2017. On May 19, 2017, the Court denied Mr. Wirth’s motion
12
(ECF No. 105) without having considered the reply, due to a delay in receiving that document in
13
chambers. Since Mr. Wirth’s reply was timely filed, the Court will review it to ensure it is duly
14
considered.
15
In his reply, Mr. Wirth points out that there are significant commonalities between his and
16
Plaintiff Brandyn Gayler’s claims, and that Defendants overstate the differences between the claims.
17
The Court acknowledges these arguments. However, the Court’s decision to deny Mr. Wirth’s
18
motion was based on a finding that joinder would significantly prejudice both the Plaintiff and
19
Defendants. Mr. Wirth’s reply does not persuade the Court otherwise. The Court therefore finds no
20
cause to withdraw or amend its order (ECF No. 105).
21
DATED: May 22, 2017.
22
23
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?