Gayler v. High Desert State Prison et al

Filing 30

ORDER Denying 23 and 24 Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 BRANDYN GAYLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) HIGH DESERT PRISON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Case No. 2:14-cv-00769-APG-CWH ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Resend Scheduling Order (doc. # 23) and Motion to Impose Sanctions for Tampering (doc. # 24), both filed March 9, 2015. 15 Plaintiff asks the Court to send him another copy of the scheduling order issued on January 30, 16 2015 (doc. # 22) because Defendants purportedly tampered with his mail, such that a page was missing 17 from the scheduling order he received. Plaintiff also asks the Court to sanction Defendants for the 18 purported tampering. 19 This Court denies Plaintiff’s requests. A review of the attachments to Plaintiff’s motions 20 reveals a 3-paged copy of this Court’s January 30th scheduling order. See Doc. # 23 at 8-10; Doc. # 24 21 at 8-10. The attachments demonstrate that Plaintiff received a correct and complete copy of this 22 Court’s scheduling order without any missing pages. As it stands, it is unclear to this Court how 23 Defendants possibly “tampered” with Plaintiff’s mail in light of the evidence just discussed. 24 25 26 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Resend Scheduling Order (doc. # 23) and Motion to Impose Sanctions for Tampering (doc. # 24) are denied. DATED: March 25, 2015 27 28 ______________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?