Hanks, et al. v. Briad Restaurant Group, LLC

Filing 185

ORDER granting 183 Stipulation re: 181 Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 10/26/2018. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-00786-GMN-PAL Document 183 Filed 09/24/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ., Bar # 3192 ROGER L. GRANDGENETT II, ESQ., Bar # 6323 MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ., Bar # 10176 NEIL C. BAKER, ESQ., Bar # 12701 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 Email: rroskelley@littler.com Email: rgrandgenett@littler.com Email: mpaek@littler.com Email: nbaker@littler.com Attorneys for Defendant BRIAD RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 ERIN HANKS, an individual, on behalf of herself and all similarly-situated individuals, Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. 17 BRIAD RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC., a New Jersey limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 Case No. 2:14-cv-00786-GMN-PAL STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ SECOND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) Defendant. 19 20 21 In accordance with Local Rule 7-1, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the time stated in 22 LR 7-2(b) for responding to Defendants’ Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (the 23 “Motion,” ECF No. 181) by two weeks. Given the parties’ heavy workloads and the unique 24 complexity of the Motion’s subject matter, the parties stipulate to these extensions to provide the 25 others with a full and fair opportunity to respond. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 Case 2:14-cv-00786-GMN-PAL Document 183 Filed 09/24/18 Page 2 of 2 1 Plaintiffs’ current deadline for filing and serving their points and authorities in response to 2 Defendants’ Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is October 12, 2018. The parties 3 hereby request that Plaintiffs be granted an additional two weeks to file and serve their response, up 4 to and including October 26, 2018. This is Plaintiffs’ first request to extend the deadline to file 5 motions in this case. 6 Dated: September 24, 2018 Dated: September 24, 2018 11 /s/ Daniel Bravo DON SPRINGMEYER, ESQ. BRADLEY SCHRAGER, ESQ. DANIEL BRAVO, ESQ. WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLC /s/ Neil C. Baker RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ. ROGER GRANDGENETT, ESQ. MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ. NEIL C. BAKER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 9 10 13 14 ORDER 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 27 DATED this ______day of September, 2018. ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?