Donovan v. Colvin
Filing
25
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 24 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS ORDERED that 18 Motion to Remand is DENIED and 19 Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDER the Clerk of Court shall se rve this Order on the person(s) and respective addresses/electronic mail noted in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
THORA D. DONOVAN,
10
11
12
13
14
v.
Case No. 2:14-cv-00790-RFB-PAL
Plaintiff, ORDER
ACCEPTING
REPORT
&
RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE PEGGY A. LEEN
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Acting Commissioner Agent of
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
15
16
17
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24) of the
Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, entered January 21, 2016.
18
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
19
recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific
20
written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §
21
636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is
22
required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed
23
findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local
24
Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct
25
“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
26
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due
27
by February 7, 2016. No objections have been filed.
28
1
1
2
3
4
The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s
recommendation(s).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
5
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Thora D. Donovan’s Motion to Reverse/Remand (ECF
6
No. 18) is DENIED and that The Commissioner’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No.19) is
7
GRANTED;
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDER the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on the person(s) and
9
respective addresses/electronic mail noted in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall
10
11
enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
DATED this 17th day of February, 2016.
12
13
_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?