Sooga v. Aranas et al
Filing
19
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically serve a copy of this Order and a copy of Plaintiff's 8 Amended Complaint on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, attention Kat Howe. Within 21 days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff of the names of the Defendants it does/does not accept service for. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
TUIOFU SOOGA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ROMEO ARANAS et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
___________________________________ )
2:14-cv-816-APG-NJK
ORDER
13
This is an action on a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, removed from
14
state court. The Court entered a screening order on the amended complaint on September
15
19, 2014. (ECF No. 15). The screening order imposed a 90-day stay and the Court entered
16
a subsequent order in which the parties were encouraged to engage in informal settlement
17
discussions. (ECF No. 15, 16). The Office of the Attorney General has filed a status report
18
indicating that settlement has not been reached and informing the Court of its intent to proceed
19
with this action. (ECF No. 18).
20
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
21
1.
The Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copy
22
of Plaintiff’s amended complaint (ECF No. 8) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State
23
of Nevada, attention Kat Howe.
24
2.
Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 15), within twenty-one
25
(21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a notice
26
advising the Court and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it accepts
27
service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the
28
names of the defendants for whom it is filing last-known-address information under seal. As
1
to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney General’s Office cannot accept service,
2
the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom
3
it has such information.
4
3.
If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiff shall
5
file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and
6
specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to which the
7
Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information, Plaintiff shall provide the
8
full name and address for the defendant(s).
9
4.
If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s),
10
such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the amended complaint
11
within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
12
5.
Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been
13
entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document
14
submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper
15
submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document
16
was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice
17
of appearance, Plaintiff shall direct service to the individual attorney named in the notice of
18
appearance, at the address stated therein. The Court may disregard any paper received by
19
a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk of the Court, and
20
any paper received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk of the Court which fails
21
to include a certificate showing proper service.
22
23
22nd
DATED: This _____ day of December, 2014.
24
25
_________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?