Uncangco v. Colvin
Filing
29
ORDER that Judge Leens 28 Report and Recommendation is Accepted, Plaintiff's 21 Motion to Remand to Social Security is Denied, and Defendant's 23 Motion to Affirm is Granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin and against Plaintiff Betty Uncangco. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/3/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
BETTY C. UNCANGCO,
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Defendant.
Case No. 2:14-cv-00824-APG-PAL
ORDER ON REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
(ECF NOS. 21, 23, 28)
9
10
On September 30, 2016, Magistrate Judge Leen entered a report and recommendation that
11
I (1) deny plaintiff Betty Uncangco’s motion to remand and (2) grant defendant Carolyn Colvin’s
12
motion to affirm. Uncangco did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de
13
novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to
14
“make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to
15
which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)
16
(en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations
17
de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).
18
19
20
I nevertheless reviewed the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Judge
Leen sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual basis for the decision.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Leen’s report and recommendation (ECF No.
21
28) is accepted, plaintiff Betty Uncangco’s motion to remand (ECF No. 21) is DENIED, and
22
defendant Carolyn Colvin’s motion to affirm (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED.
23
24
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of
defendant Carolyn W. Colvin and against plaintiff Betty Uncangco.
DATED this 3rd day of November, 2016.
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?