Horne v. Everbank et al
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 29 Stipulation of Dismissal. Defendant Everbank is Dismissed From This Case Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/26/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
SAO
Robert B. Noggle, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 11427
Paul R.M. Cullen, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 12355
NOGGLE LAW PLLC
376 East Warm Springs Rd., Ste. 140
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Ph.: 702-450-6300 | Fax: 702-642-9766
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
PETER HORNE
INVESTMENTS,
DBA
HALO
REALTY
CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-00826
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
EVERBANK; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE
CORPORATION; SUE ELLEN SMITH,
14
Defendants.
15
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER
17
18
19
//
20
21
//
22
23
24
//
25
26
//
27
28
- 1 -
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between plaintiff, Peter Horne dba Halo Realty Investments
2
(“Plaintiff”), by and through its counsel of record, Paul R.M. Cullen, Esq. of NOGGLE LAW PLLC,
3
and defendant, EverBank (“EverBank”) by and through its counsel of record, I-Che Lai, Esq. of
4
BROOKS HUBLEY LLP, that this case may be dismissed without prejudice as to EverBank with
5
6
each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
7
NOGGLE LAW PLLC
BROOKS HUBLEY LLP
8
By: /s/ Paul R.M. Cullen
Robert B. Noggle, Esq.
Paul R.M. Cullen, Esq.
376 East Warm Springs Road, Ste. 140
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: /s/ I-Che Lai
I-Che Lai, Esq.
Michael R. Brooks, Esq.
1645 Village Center Circle, Ste. 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorneys for EverBank
9
10
11
12
26th
IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of March, 2015.
13
14
____________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
Respectfully submitted by:
17
NOGGLE LAW PLLC
18
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ Paul R.M. Cullen
Robert B. Noggle, Esq.
Paul R.M. Cullen, Esq.
376 E. Warm Springs Road, Ste. 140
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Attorneys for Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?