Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ANC Vista I, LLC et al

Filing 108

ORDER re 103 Motion to Seal. Plaintiff shall file, no later than September 24, 2015, a supplement explaining whether redaction is feasible and, if so, a proposed redacted version of the exhibits. The Clerks Office is INSTRUCTED to keep the subject documents sealed for the time being. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 ANC VISTA I, LLC, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-00840-JCM-NJK ORDER 16 Pending before the Court is a motion to seal. Docket No. 103. Plaintiff seeks to keep certain 17 exhibits sealed on the basis that they refer to the Garff Appraisal and “portions” of the exhibits are 18 proprietary in nature. See Docket Nos. 103-1, 103-2. The Ninth Circuit has made plain that, to the 19 extent any confidential information can be easily redacted while leaving meaningful information 20 available to the public, the Court must order that redacted versions be filed rather than sealing entire 21 documents. Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1137 (9th Cir. 2003); see also In 22 re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, 661 F.3d 417, 425 (9th Cir. 2011) (the district 23 court must “keep in mind the possibility of redacting the sensitive material”).1 Plaintiff has not 24 explained whether its concerns can be alleviated by filing a redacted version of the exhibits, rather than 25 sealing them in their entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file, no later than September 24, 2015, a 26 27 28 1 The Court expresses no opinion as to the merits of the motion to seal. 1 supplement explaining whether redaction is feasible and, if so, a proposed redacted version of the 2 exhibits. 3 The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to keep the subject documents sealed for the time being. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: September 21, 2015 6 7 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?