Ruhlmann et al v. Rudolfsky et al

Filing 226

ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' 182 Motion to Compel and Denying as moot Defendants' 212 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

JAMES RUHLMANN, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
GLENN RUDOLFSKY, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:14-cv-0879-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 182, 212)

16

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to compel and for sanctions. Docket No. 182.

17

Defendants filed a response in opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. Docket Nos. 199, 206. United States

18

District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II held a hearing on various motions on June 23, 2017. It appears that

19

some of the issues addressed at that hearing may bear on the instant motion. E.g., Docket No. 199 at 2

20

(stating that issues regarding cancelled checks and bank information are pending review by the assigned

21

district judge). Given that the landscape underlying this motion may have shifted since the motion was

22

filed, it is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

23
24

Because the Court is denying without prejudice the underlying motion to compel and for sanctions,
Defendants’ motion for leave to file a sur-reply at Docket No. 212 is hereby DENIED as moot.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

DATED: June 27, 2017

27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge