Ruhlmann et al v. Rudolfsky et al

Filing 226

ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' 182 Motion to Compel and Denying as moot Defendants' 212 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JAMES RUHLMANN, et al., ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) GLENN RUDOLFSKY, et al., ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:14-cv-0879-RFB-NJK ORDER (Docket Nos. 182, 212) 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to compel and for sanctions. Docket No. 182. 17 Defendants filed a response in opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. Docket Nos. 199, 206. United States 18 District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II held a hearing on various motions on June 23, 2017. It appears that 19 some of the issues addressed at that hearing may bear on the instant motion. E.g., Docket No. 199 at 2 20 (stating that issues regarding cancelled checks and bank information are pending review by the assigned 21 district judge). Given that the landscape underlying this motion may have shifted since the motion was 22 filed, it is hereby DENIED without prejudice. 23 24 Because the Court is denying without prejudice the underlying motion to compel and for sanctions, Defendants’ motion for leave to file a sur-reply at Docket No. 212 is hereby DENIED as moot. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: June 27, 2017 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?