Ruhlmann et al v. Rudolfsky et al

Filing 26

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 25 Proposed Discovery Plan. Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery due by 9/23/2014. Responses due by 9/30/2014. Replies due by 10/6/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
MAX RUHLMANN, et al.,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
GLENN RUDOLFSKY, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-00879-RFB-NJK
ORDER

16

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan, which indicates that

17

Defendants intend to seek a stay of discovery. See Docket No. 25. The Court hereby DENIES the

18

discovery plan without prejudice. The Court further ORDERS that Defendants’ motion to stay

19

discovery must be filed no later than September 23, 2014. Any response must be filed no later than

20

September 30, 2014, and any reply must be filed no later than October 6, 2014. The parties’ briefing

21

shall address the relevant standards applied in this district for motions to stay discovery pending

22

resolution of a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Kabo Tools Co. v.

23

Porauto Indus. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 156928 (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2013) (Kabo Tools II); Kabo

24

Tools Co.v. Porauto Indus. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist Lexis 53570 (D. Nev. Apr. 15, 2013) (Kabo Tools I).

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

DATED: September 16, 2014

27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge