Ruhlmann et al v. Rudolfsky et al
Filing
95
ORDER Denying 94 Motion without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
JAMES RUHLMANN, et al.,
9
Plaintiff(s),
10
vs.
11
GLENN RUDOLFSKY, et al.,
12
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:14-cv-00879-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 94)
13
Pending before the Court is a renewed request by Plaintiffs to extend deadlines in the scheduling
14
order by 77 days. See Docket No. 94; see also Docket No. 75 (currently operative scheduling order).
15
The motion is predicated in significant part on summaries of representations made to United States
16
District Judge Richard F. Boulware during an unrelated hearing, and representations of Judge
17
Boulware’s statements at that hearing. See Docket No. 94 at 2. A transcript of that hearing was not
18
attached as Plaintiffs have not yet received it. See id. at 2 n.1. At this point, the motion is DENIED
19
without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiffs wish to continue to rely on any statements made by Judge
20
Boulware from the bench, any renewed motion shall attach the pertinent transcript and shall cite to the
21
particular page being referenced.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
DATED: August 23, 2016
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?