Ruhlmann et al v. Rudolfsky et al

Filing 95

ORDER Denying 94 Motion without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 JAMES RUHLMANN, et al., 9 Plaintiff(s), 10 vs. 11 GLENN RUDOLFSKY, et al., 12 Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-00879-RFB-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 94) 13 Pending before the Court is a renewed request by Plaintiffs to extend deadlines in the scheduling 14 order by 77 days. See Docket No. 94; see also Docket No. 75 (currently operative scheduling order). 15 The motion is predicated in significant part on summaries of representations made to United States 16 District Judge Richard F. Boulware during an unrelated hearing, and representations of Judge 17 Boulware’s statements at that hearing. See Docket No. 94 at 2. A transcript of that hearing was not 18 attached as Plaintiffs have not yet received it. See id. at 2 n.1. At this point, the motion is DENIED 19 without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiffs wish to continue to rely on any statements made by Judge 20 Boulware from the bench, any renewed motion shall attach the pertinent transcript and shall cite to the 21 particular page being referenced. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: August 23, 2016 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?