Davila v. Holder et al

Filing 7

ORDER denying 6 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order into the electronic docket why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/29/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ______________________________________ ) ) JULIA DAVILA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ERIC H. HOLDER et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:14-cv-00931-RCJ-CWH ORDER 12 13 Plaintiff Julia Davila has sued Attorney General Eric Holder, the “District Director” of 14 the U.S. Customs and Immigration Service (the “District Director”) and U.S. Attorney for the 15 District of Nevada Daniel Bogden in this Court based on the denial of her application for 16 permanent residence. She alleges to have exhausted her administrative remedies. No Defendant 17 has appeared, and Plaintiff has asked the Court to enter default against Holder and the District 18 Director, but not against Bogden. 19 The Court denies the motion, as there is no proof of proper service upon Holder or the 20 District Director. In order to serve a federal officer in his or her official capacity, as Plaintiff has 21 sued Defendants here, the plaintiff must serve the United States itself and also send a copy of the 22 summons and complaint by registered or certified mail to the relevant officer. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 4(i)(2). In order to serve the United States, the plaintiff must: (1) deliver a copy of the summons 24 1 of 3 1 and complaint to the U.S. Attorney in the district where the case is brought (or to a designated 2 assistant U.S. attorney or clerk) or send a copy of the summons and complaint by registered or 3 certified mail to the civil-process clerk at the relevant U.S. attorney’s office; (2) end a copy of 4 the summons and complaint by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General in 5 Washington, D.C.; and (3) [not applicable here]. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1). Though so entitled in 6 the docket, Plaintiff has adduced no executed summonses but only copies of return receipts (PS 7 Forms 3811) for parcels sent to the District Director in Las Vegas, Nevada, the Attorney General 8 in Washington, D.C., and the Office of Immigration Litigation in Washington D.C. The return 9 receipts do not themselves indicate whether the parcels were sent via registered mail, certified 10 mail, or only first class mail, but the U.S. Postal Service’s website indicates the items sent with 11 these tracking numbers were sent via certified mail. However, there is no evidence of any 12 service upon U.S. Attorney Bogden. Service upon him or his designated assistant or clerk is 13 required to complete service upon any of the parties in this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A). 14 The Court therefore cannot enter default. Also, because no party has been properly served 15 within 120 days of the filing of the Complaint, the Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why 16 the Complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 4(m). 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 2 of 3 CONCLUSION 1 2 3 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Entry of Default (ECF No. 6) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) 5 days of the entry of this Order into the electronic docket why the case should not be dismissed 6 without prejudice under Rule 4(m). 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 29th day October, 2014. Dated this 24th day of of October, 2014. 9 10 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?