Valentine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Filing 20

ORDER that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b), the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined in this Order, with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/25/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10

CHRISTY VALENTINE,

11

Plaintiff(s),

12

vs.

13

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY,

14
Defendant(s).
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-00999-RCJ-NJK
ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (Docket No. 18), which the Court

17

approved to facilitate discovery in this case. This order reminds counsel that there is a presumption of

18

public access to judicial files and records. A party seeking to file a confidential document under seal must

19

file a motion to seal and must comply with the Ninth Circuit’s directives in Kamakana v. City and County

20

of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).

21

The Court has adopted electronic filing procedures, and with a few exceptions not applicable

22

here, the Clerk of the Court no longer maintains paper records. Special Order 109 requires the Clerk of

23

the Court to maintain the official files for all cases filed on or after November 7, 2005, in electronic form.

24

The electronic record constitutes the official record of the court. Attorneys must file documents under seal

25

using the Court’s electronic filing procedures. See Local Rule 10-5(b). That rule provides:

26
27
28

Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior Court order, papers filed
with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a motion for leave to file
those documents under seal, and shall be filed in accordance with the Court’s
electronic filing procedures. If papers are filed under seal pursuant to prior
Court order, the papers shall bear the following notation on the first page,

1

directly under the case number: “FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO
COURT ORDER DATED __________.” All papers filed under seal will
remain sealed until such time as the Court may deny the motion to seal or
enter an order to unseal them, or the documents are unsealed pursuant to
Local Rule.

2
3
4

Id. Documents filed under seal are not accessible to the public.

5

The Court has approved the blanket protective order to facilitate discovery exchanges. But there

6

has been no showing, and the Court has not found, that any specific documents are secret or confidential.

7

The parties have not provided specific facts supported by declarations or concrete examples to establish

8

that a protective order is required to protect any specific trade secret or other confidential information

9

pursuant to Rule 26(c) or that disclosure would cause an identifiable and significant harm. The Ninth

10

Circuit has held that there is a presumption of public access to judicial files and records and that parties

11

seeking to maintain the confidentiality of documents attached to nondispositive motions must show good

12

cause exists to overcome the presumption of public access. See Kamakana 447 F.3d at 1179. Parties

13

seeking to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive motions must show compelling

14

reasons sufficient to overcome the presumption of public access. Id. at 1180.1

15

If the sole ground for a motion to seal is that the opposing party (or non-party) has designated a

16

document as subject to protection pursuant to the stipulated protective order, the movant must notify the

17

opposing party (or non-party) at least seven days prior to filing the designated document. The designating

18

party must then make a good faith determination if the relevant standard for sealing is met. To the extent

19

the designating party does not believe the relevant standard for sealing can be met, it shall indicate that the

20

document may be filed publicly no later than four days after receiving notice of the intended filing. To the

21

extent the designating party believes the relevant standard for sealing can be met, it shall provide a

22

declaration supporting that assertion no later than four days after receiving notice of the intended filing. The

23

filing party shall then attach that declaration to its motion to seal the designated material. If the designating

24

party fails to provide such a declaration in support of the motion to seal, the filing party shall file a motion to

25
26
27
28

1

Additional information regarding the requirements for filing under seal can be found at The Vaccine
Center LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 68298 (D. Nev. May 14, 2013) (discussing,
inter alia, the standards for sealing, standard for redaction rather than sealing entire documents, and impact of
the stipulated protective order on a motion to seal).
2

1

seal so indicating and the Court may order the document filed in the public record.2

2

IT IS ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b), the

3

Ninth Circuit’s decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect to

4

any documents filed under seal. To the extent any aspect of the stipulated protective order may conflict

5

with this order or Local Rule 10-5(b), that aspect of the stipulated protective order is hereby superseded

6

with this order.

7

DATED: November 25, 2014

8
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

In the event of an emergency motion, the above procedures shall not apply. Instead, the movant shall
file a motion to seal and the designating party shall file a declaration in support of that motion to seal within three
days of its filing. If the designating party fails to timely file such a declaration, the Court may order the
document filed in the public record.
3