Crazy Ely WesternVillage, LLC et al v. City of Las Vegas

Filing 43

ORDER that 10 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing currently set for Thursday, November 19, 2015 is VACATED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 9 G & G FREMONT, LLC, a Nevada limited Liability company; CRAZY ELY WESTERN VILLAGE, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 12 v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Defendant(s). 13 14 ORDER Plaintiff(s), 10 11 Case No. 2:14-CV-1006 JCM (PAL) Presently before the court is plaintiff Crazy Ely Western Village’s motion for preliminary 15 16 injunction. (Doc. #10). The Ninth Circuit remanded for further findings as to whether the 17 advertising restrictions at issue in this case directly and materially advance the city’s interests, and 18 whether any less-restrictive alternatives to the advertising restrictions are available. 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiffs and defendants filed briefs regarding the advertising restrictions. (Docs. #41 and #42). In their briefs, both parties state that the issues on remand are now moot because the Las Vegas City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6468 which repealed LVMC 6.50.475(F)-(H) “in response to current litigation regarding those provisions.” (Doc. #42). 24 Accordingly, 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff Crazy Ely 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge Western Village’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. #10) be, and the same hereby is, 1 DENIED as moot. Furthermore, the preliminary injunction hearing currently set for Thursday, 2 November 19, 2015, is VACATED. 3 DATED November 17, 2015. 4 5 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?