Peters v. Neven et al

Filing 19

ORDER. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondents second motion for extension of time 17 is GRANTED. Respondents shall file and serve their response to the amended petition 8 on or before July 22, 2015. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents first motion for extension of time 16 is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioners pro se motion to stay 18 isSTRICKEN. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) .

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

***
10
WILSON O. PETERS,
11
Petitioner,

Case No. 2:14-cv-01055-RFB-VCF

12
vs.

ORDER

13
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
14
Respondents.
15
16
17

Petitioner, through counsel, filed an amended petition in this habeas corpus proceeding (ECF

18

#8). Respondents seek an extension of time to respond to the amended petition (ECF #17). Good cause

19

appearing, respondents’ motion is granted.

20

Petitioner has also filed a pro se motion for stay, in which he argues, without elaboration, that

21

his counsel has not corrected inaccuracies in his amended petition (ECF #18). Petitioner may not file

22

papers in proper person while represented by counsel, see Local Rule IA 10-6(a), and therefore, the

23

motion shall be stricken.

24

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondents’ second motion for extension of time (ECF

25

#17) is GRANTED. Respondents shall file and serve their response to the amended petition on or

26

before July 22, 2015.

27
28

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents’ first motion for extension of time (ECF #16)
is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

1
2
3

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s pro se motion to stay (ECF #18) is
STRICKEN.
DATED this 30th day of June, 2015.

4
5
6

_________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-