Bauman v. Saxe Management LLC et al
Filing
244
ORDER granting 239 Motion for Attorney Fees; ORDER granting 241 Motion to Certify Class (see Order attached). Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/30/2020.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JEREMY BAUMAN, individually and on
behalf of all persons similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No.:
2:14-cv-01125-RFB-BNW
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTAND
DISMISSING CLASS PLAINTIFFS’
CLAIMS
DAVID SAXE, et al.,
Defendants.
In consolidation with
Case No.:
2:14-cv-01160-RFB-BNW
BIJAN RAZILOU, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
V THEATER GROUP, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
This Court, having held a Final Approval Hearing on June 25, 2020, having provided
notice of that hearing in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order, and having considered
all matters submitted to it in connection with the Final Approval Hearing and otherwise, and
finding no just reason for delay in entry of this Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action
Settlement and Dismissing Class Plaintiffs’ Claims (the “Final Approval Order” or this “Order”)
and good cause appearing therefore,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
Unless otherwise defined, all capitalized terms in this Final Approval Order shall
have the same meaning as they do in the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 224-1).
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
2.
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over the
Parties, including all Settlement Class Members with respect to the Settlement Class certified for
settlement purposes, as follows:
All persons and entities to whom Defendants attempted transmission of
one or more text messages, between and including April 1, 2013, to May
31, 2014, to a telephone number assigned to a cell phone at the time of
transmission. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, any entity that has
a controlling interest in Defendants, and Defendants’ current or former
directors, officers, counsel, and their immediate families, and all persons
who validly exclude themselves or opt out of the Settlement Class.
3.
The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement was negotiated at arm’s length by
experienced counsel who were fully informed of the facts and circumstances of the Action and of
the strengths and weaknesses of their respective positions. Further, settlement occurred only after
significant discovery, motion practice, and after the parties negotiated over a period of many
months. Counsel for the Parties were therefore well positioned to evaluate the benefits of the
Settlement Agreement, taking into account the expense, risk, and uncertainty of protracted
litigation with respect to numerous difficult questions of fact and law.
4.
The Court finally certifies the Settlement Class for settlement purposes and finds,
for settlement purposes, that the Action satisfies all the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically: (a) the number of Settlement Class Members is so
numerous that joinder of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and
fact common to the Settlement Class; (c) the claims of the Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of
the Settlement Class they seek to represent; (d) Plaintiffs have and will continue to fairly and
adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class for purposes of entering into the
Settlement Agreement; (e) the questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class
Members predominate over any questions affecting any individual Settlement Class Member; (f)
2
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
the Settlement Class is ascertainable; and (g) a class action settlement is superior to the other
available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.
5.
The Court finally appoints the law firms of Sound Justice Law Group, PLLC;
Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC; Bailey Kennedy, LLP; Strategic Legal Practices, APC; and
Marquis Aurbach Coffing, as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class; and Albert H. Kirby of
Sound Justice Law Group, PLLC and Matthew Mendelsohn of Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman,
LLC, as Lead Class Counsel for the Settlement Class.
6.
The Court finally designates Plaintiffs Jeremy Bauman and Bijan Razilou as the
Class Representatives.
7.
The Court makes the following findings and conclusions regarding notice to the
Settlement Class:
a.
The Class Notice was disseminated to persons in the Settlement Class in
accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Class Notice and its
dissemination were in compliance with the Court’s Preliminary Approval Order;
b.
The Class Notice: (i) constituted the best practicable notice under the
circumstances to potential Settlement Class Members, (ii) constituted notice that was reasonably
calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of
the Action, their right to object or to exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement, and
their right to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, (iii) was reasonable and constituted due,
adequate, and sufficient individual notice to all persons entitled to be provided with notice, and
(iv) complied fully with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, the United States Constitution,
the Rules of this Court, and any other applicable law.
3
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
c.
The Court finds that Defendants have complied with their notice
obligations under the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, in connection with the
proposed Settlement.
8.
The Court finally approves the Settlement Agreement as fair, reasonable and
adequate pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). The terms and provisions of the Settlement
Agreement, including all exhibits thereto, have been entered into in good faith and are hereby
fully and finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate as to, and in the best interests of,
each of the Parties and the Settlement Class Members.
9.
The Court approves the plan of distribution for the Cash Fund as set forth in the
Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Administrator is ordered to comply with the terms of the
Agreement with respect to distribution of Cash Fund.
10.
By incorporating the Agreement and its terms herein, this Court determines that
this Final Approval Order complies in all respects with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(1).
11.
Class Counsel have moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h) and 52(a) for an
award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. Pursuant to Rules 23(h)(3) and 52(a)
this Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
a.
that the Class Settlement confers substantial benefits on the Settlement
Class Members;
b.
that the value conferred on the Settlement Class is immediate and readily
c.
that fourteen days (14) after Final Approval of the Settlement, the Ticket
quantifiable;
Codes shall be activated and Settlement Class Members will be able to use the Ticket Codes to
4
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
obtain the Ticket Compensation, which represents a significant portion of the damages that
would be available to them were they to prevail in an individual action under the TCPA;
d.
that Class Counsel vigorously and effectively pursued the Settlement
Class Members’ claims before this Court in this complex case;
e.
that the Class Settlement was obtained as a direct result of Class Counsel’s
f.
that the Class Settlement was reached following extensive negotiation
advocacy;
between Class Counsel and Counsel for Defendants, and was negotiated in good faith and in the
absence of collusion; and
g.
that counsel who recover a common benefit for persons other than himself
or his client is entitled to a reasonable attorneys’ fee from the Settlement Fund as a whole. See,
e.g., Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472, 478 (1980); Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 866, 900
n.16 (1984).
12.
Accordingly, Class Counsel are hereby awarded $668,320.10 for attorneys’ fees
and $101,679.90 in litigation expenses, including settlement administration costs, from the Cash
Fund, which this Court finds to be fair and reasonable, and which amount shall be paid to Class
Counsel from the Cash Fund in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Class
Counsel shall be responsible for allocating and shall allocate this award of attorneys’ fees, costs,
and expenses that are awarded amongst and between Class Counsel.
13.
The Class Representatives, as identified in the Preliminary Approval Order, are
hereby compensated in the amount of $15,000.00 each for their efforts in this case.
14.
The terms of the Settlement Agreement and of this Final Approval Order,
including all exhibits thereto, shall be forever binding in all pending and future lawsuits
5
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
maintained by the Plaintiffs and all other Settlement Class Members, and anyone claiming
through them such as heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns.
15.
The Releases, which are set forth in Section V of the Settlement Agreement and
which are also set forth below, are expressly incorporated herein in all respects and are effective
as of the date of this Order; and the Released Parties are fully, conclusively, irrevocably, forever,
and finally released, relinquished, and discharged by the Settlement Class (except those Class
Members who sent valid Exclusion Request) from all Released Claims.
a.
In connection with the Releases in section V of the Settlement Agreement,
and without expanding their scope in any way, Plaintiffs and each Settlement Class Member
shall be deemed, as of the date of Final Approval, to have waived any and all provisions, rights,
benefits conferred by Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, and any statute, rule and legal
doctrine similar, comparable, or equivalent to California Civil Code Section 1542, which
provides that:
A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or
suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if
known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the
debtor.
To the extent that anyone might argue that these principles of law are applicable -notwithstanding that the Settling Parties have chosen California law to govern this Settlement
Agreement – Plaintiffs hereby agree, and each Settlement Class Member will be deemed to
agree, that the provisions of all such principles of law or similar federal or state laws, rights,
rules, or legal principles are hereby knowingly and voluntarily waived, relinquished, and
released. The Plaintiffs recognize, and each Settlement Class Member will be deemed to
recognize, that, even if they may later discover facts in addition to or different from those which
they now know or believe to be true, they fully, finally, and forever settle and release any and all
6
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
claims covered by these Releases upon entry of the Judgment. The Settling Parties acknowledge
that the foregoing Releases were bargained for and are a material element of the Agreement.
The California Civil Code Section 1542 release herein shall be expressly limited to claims arise
out of or relate in any way to the sending of text messages (including but not limited to text
messages sent using an “automatic telephone dialing system”) for any purpose (including but not
limited to advertising, marketing, or informational purposes), that have been, or could have been,
brought in the Action, as well as any claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative facts as
any of the claims asserted in the Action.
b.
The Settlement Agreement and the Releases therein do not affect the
rights of Settlement Class Members who timely and properly submit a Request for Exclusion
from the Settlement in accordance with the requirements in Section III of this Settlement
Agreement.
c.
The administration and consummation of the Settlement as embodied in
this Settlement Agreement shall be under the authority of the Court. The Court shall retain
jurisdiction to protect, preserve, and implement the Settlement Agreement, including, but not
limited to, enforcement of the Releases contained in the Agreement. The Court shall retain
jurisdiction in order to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate in
administering and implementing the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement.
Upon entry of the Final Approval Order and the Judgment: (i) the Settlement Agreement
shall be the exclusive remedy for any and all Settlement Class Members, except those who have
properly requested exclusion (opted out) in accordance with the terms and provisions of the
Settlement Agreement; (ii) the Released Parties shall not be subject to liability or expense for
any of the Released Claims to any Settlement Class Member(s) except as set forth in the
7
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
Settlement Agreement; and (iii) Settlement Class Members who have not opted out shall be
permanently barred from filing, commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, or participating in (as
class members or otherwise) any action in any jurisdiction based on the Released Claims.
d.
Upon Final Approval, each member of the Settlement Class, including the
Plaintiffs, shall, by operation of the Judgment, be deemed to have fully, conclusively,
irrevocably, forever and finally released, relinquished, and discharged the Released Parties from
any and all claims, causes of action, suits, obligations, debts, demands, agreements, promises,
liabilities, damages, losses, controversies, costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees of any nature
whatsoever, whether based on any federal law, state law, common law, territorial law, foreign
law, contract, rule, regulation, any regulatory promulgation (including, but not limited to, any
opinion or declaratory ruling), common law or equity, whether known or unknown, suspected or
unsuspected, asserted or unasserted, foreseen or unforeseen, actual or contingent, liquidated or
unliquidated, punitive or compensatory, as of the date of Final Approval, that arise out of or
relate in any way to the sending of text messages (including but not limited to text messages
sent using an “automatic telephone dialing system”) for any purpose (including but not limited
to advertising, marketing, or informational purposes), that have been, or could have been,
brought in the Action, as well as any claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative facts as
any of the claims asserted in the Action.
e.
Nothing in the Settlement Agreement shall preclude any action to enforce
the terms of the Settlement Agreement, including participation in any of the processes detailed
therein. The Releases set forth therein are not intended to include the release of any rights or
duties of the Settling Parties arising out of the Settlement Agreement, including the express
warranties and covenants contained therein.
8
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
16.
The Court dismisses all Released Claims, with prejudice, without costs to any
Party, except as expressly provided for in the Settlement Agreement.
17.
This Order, the Judgment to be entered pursuant to this Order, and the Settlement
Agreement (including the Exhibits thereto) may be filed in any action against or by any Released
Party to support a defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement,
judgment bar or reduction, or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar
defense or counterclaim.
18.
Without further order of the Court, the Settling Parties may agree to reasonably
necessary extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.
19.
This Order and the Judgment to be entered pursuant to this Order shall be
effective upon entry. In the event that this Order and/or the Judgment to be entered pursuant to
this Order are reversed or vacated pursuant to a direct appeal in the Action or the Settlement
Agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms, all orders entered and releases delivered in
connection herewith shall be null and void.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 30th day of June, 2020.
_______________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
9
4844-0357-8786v.1 0104433-000001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?