Burgon v. Nevens et al
Filing
60
ORDER Granting 59 Motion to Extend Time to Answer Remaining Claims in Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attorney General State of Nevada and D.W. Nevens answer due 7/20/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
6
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Attorney General
Heidi Parry Stern (Bar. No. 8873)
Chief Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave., #3900
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 486-3594 (phone)
(702) 486-2377 (fax)
HStern@ag.nv.gov
7
Attorneys for Respondents
2
3
4
5
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
CLAY BURGON,
Case No. 2:14-cv-01128-RFB-CWH
11
12
13
14
Petitioner,
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER
REMAINING CLAIMS IN AMENDED
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS (ECF NO. 36)
vs.
D.W. NEVEN, et al.,
Respondents.
(First Request)
15
16
17
Respondents hereby request an extension of time of an additional sixty (60) days, up to and
18
including July 20, 2018, within which to answer the remaining claims in the Amended Petition for Writ
19
of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 36). The current due date to answer is May 21, 2018.
20
This motion is based on the accompanying Declaration of Counsel.
21
DATED this 21st day of May, 2018.
22
23
24
25
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Attorney General
By: /s/ Heidi Parry Stern
Heidi Parry Stern (Bar. No. 8873)
Chief Deputy Attorney General
26
27
28
-1-
DECLARATION OF HEIDI PARRY STERN
1
2
I, HEIDI PARRY STERN, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and declare as follows:
3
1.
That I an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Nevada; that I am qualified and
4
admitted to practice before this Court; and that I am employed as a Deputy Attorney General in the
5
Office of the Nevada Attorney General;
2.
6
That, pursuant to my duties as a Chief Deputy Attorney General, I have been assigned to
7
represent Respondents in the matter of Clay Burgon v. D.W. Neven, et al., 2:14-cv-01128-RFB-CWH
8
and, as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein;
3.
9
10
That the Answer to the Remaining Claims of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus is due to be filed May 21, 2018.
4.
11
This extension is necessary as I have been working to finalize supplemental briefing in
12
the Ninth Circuit in the case of Marquez v. E.K. McDaniel, et al., Case No. 17-15154, which will be
13
argued in front of the Ninth Circuit on June, 6, 2018. I have also been preparing, and will be filing next
14
week, an Answering Brief in the Ninth Circuit in the capital case of Bolin v. Renee Baker, et al., Case
15
No. 15-99004.
16
5.
Respondents request 60 days to file their reply, up to and including July 20, 2018.
17
6.
I have contacted opposing counsel, and she has no objection to this request for
18
extension.
7.
19
20
This is Respondents’ first motion for enlargement of time to answer the remaining
claims in the amended petition.
8.
21
This Motion for enlargement of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of
22
delay.
23
DATED this 21st day of May, 2018.
APPROVED:
24
25
26
27
28
DATED this 22nd day of May, 2018.
/s/ Heidi Parry Stern
Heidi Parry Stern
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ____ day of ____________, 2018.
__________________________
____________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
DistrictStates District Judge
United Court Judge
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Extension of
3
Time to Answer Remaining Claims in Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Clerk of
4
the Court by using the CM/ECF system on the 21st day of May, 2018.
5
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF
6
system.
7
Kimberly Sandberg
Assistant Federal Public Defender
411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250
Las Vegas, NV 89101
8
9
10
11
/s/ K. Plett
An employee of the Office of the Attorney General
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?