Burgon v. Nevens et al

Filing 60

ORDER Granting 59 Motion to Extend Time to Answer Remaining Claims in Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attorney General State of Nevada and D.W. Nevens answer due 7/20/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 6 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General Heidi Parry Stern (Bar. No. 8873) Chief Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., #3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 486-3594 (phone) (702) 486-2377 (fax) HStern@ag.nv.gov 7 Attorneys for Respondents 2 3 4 5 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 CLAY BURGON, Case No. 2:14-cv-01128-RFB-CWH 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER REMAINING CLAIMS IN AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 36) vs. D.W. NEVEN, et al., Respondents. (First Request) 15 16 17 Respondents hereby request an extension of time of an additional sixty (60) days, up to and 18 including July 20, 2018, within which to answer the remaining claims in the Amended Petition for Writ 19 of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 36). The current due date to answer is May 21, 2018. 20 This motion is based on the accompanying Declaration of Counsel. 21 DATED this 21st day of May, 2018. 22 23 24 25 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General By: /s/ Heidi Parry Stern Heidi Parry Stern (Bar. No. 8873) Chief Deputy Attorney General 26 27 28 -1- DECLARATION OF HEIDI PARRY STERN 1 2 I, HEIDI PARRY STERN, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and declare as follows: 3 1. That I an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Nevada; that I am qualified and 4 admitted to practice before this Court; and that I am employed as a Deputy Attorney General in the 5 Office of the Nevada Attorney General; 2. 6 That, pursuant to my duties as a Chief Deputy Attorney General, I have been assigned to 7 represent Respondents in the matter of Clay Burgon v. D.W. Neven, et al., 2:14-cv-01128-RFB-CWH 8 and, as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein; 3. 9 10 That the Answer to the Remaining Claims of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is due to be filed May 21, 2018. 4. 11 This extension is necessary as I have been working to finalize supplemental briefing in 12 the Ninth Circuit in the case of Marquez v. E.K. McDaniel, et al., Case No. 17-15154, which will be 13 argued in front of the Ninth Circuit on June, 6, 2018. I have also been preparing, and will be filing next 14 week, an Answering Brief in the Ninth Circuit in the capital case of Bolin v. Renee Baker, et al., Case 15 No. 15-99004. 16 5. Respondents request 60 days to file their reply, up to and including July 20, 2018. 17 6. I have contacted opposing counsel, and she has no objection to this request for 18 extension. 7. 19 20 This is Respondents’ first motion for enlargement of time to answer the remaining claims in the amended petition. 8. 21 This Motion for enlargement of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of 22 delay. 23 DATED this 21st day of May, 2018. APPROVED: 24 25 26 27 28 DATED this 22nd day of May, 2018. /s/ Heidi Parry Stern Heidi Parry Stern IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ____ day of ____________, 2018. __________________________ ____________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II DistrictStates District Judge United Court Judge -2- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Extension of 3 Time to Answer Remaining Claims in Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Clerk of 4 the Court by using the CM/ECF system on the 21st day of May, 2018. 5 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF 6 system. 7 Kimberly Sandberg Assistant Federal Public Defender 411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250 Las Vegas, NV 89101 8 9 10 11 /s/ K. Plett An employee of the Office of the Attorney General 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?