Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

Filing 64

ORDER deeming ECF No. 54 Order to Show Cause satisfied and this action will not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/19/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, 6 ORDER FINDING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE SATISFIED v. 7 8 Case No. 2:14-cv-001131-APG-VCF SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 This action was filed in this court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. ECF No. 1 at 2. 12 Based on plaintiff Deutsche’s failure to address the citizenship of defendant SFR’s members in the 13 complaint, I entered an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. See Johnson 14 v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006) (stating that “an LLC is 15 a citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens”). 16 The parties’ responses adequately establish the court had diversity jurisdiction at the time 17 the original complaint was filed because Deutsche and SFR are diverse. ECF Nos. 56, 58. The 18 parties’ responses also establish the court had diversity and federal question jurisdiction when the 19 amended complaint was filed because Deutsche is diverse from SFR and Pearl Cove III 20 Homeowners Association and a federal claim is stated on the face of the complaint. ECF No. 18 21 (seeking a declaration that Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 116 violates the Fifth Amendment to 22 the United States Constitution). Because the court had federal question jurisdiction before SFR 23 filed its counterclaim bringing in as plaintiffs Martha Massango and Apande Nelson Ejelle, I need 24 not consider whether these two parties’ addition to the case would destroy diversity jurisdiction. 25 See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(b). 26 //// 27 //// 28 1 2 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the order to show cause (ECF No. 54) is deemed satisfied and this action will not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. DATED THIS 19th day of May, 2016. 4 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?