Navarette v. Art of Shaving, LLC et al
Filing
28
ORDER that 11 and 16 Motions to Dismiss filed by defendants TAOS and CoWorx are GRANTED. The complaint is dismissed as to those defendants. FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed as to defendants Christine Lambert, Laurina Esposito, Corina Mettlin, Lizette Salas, and Herzog for failure to timely serve them with process. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
JUANITA R. NAVARETTE,
Case No. 2:14-cv-1161-APG-CWH
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
ART OF SHAVING, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
On December 4, 2014, defendant The Art of Shaving, LLC (“TAOS”) filed a motion to
15
dismiss. (Dkt. #11.) On December 17, 2014, defendant CoWorx Staffing Services, LLC
16
(“CoWorx”) filed a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. #16.) No opposition has been filed to either motion.
17
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure to file points and authorities in response to a motion
18
constitutes consent to the granting of the motion. Nevertheless, I have reviewed both motions to
19
dismiss, and they are meritorious.
20
On December 30, 2014, Magistrate Judge Hoffman granted Plaintiff’s motion to extend
21
time to effectuate service. (Dkt. ##21, 23) Magistrate Judge Hoffman gave Plaintiff until January
22
29, 2015 to serve the remaining defendants. To date, Plaintiff has failed to prove effective
23
service. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), good cause exists to dismiss the complaint
24
as to defendants Christine Lambert, Laurina Esposito, Corina Mettlin, Lizette Salas, and Herzog.
25
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motions to dismiss filed by defendants TAOS
26
and CoWorx (Dkt. ##11, 16) are GRANTED. The complaint is dismissed as to those defendants.
27
28
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed as to defendants Christine
2
Lambert, Laurina Esposito, Corina Mettlin, Lizette Salas, and Herzog for failure to timely serve
3
them with process.
4
The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
5
Dated: February 19, 2015.
6
7
8
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?