Morris et al v. Hernandez et al
Filing
59
ORDER that all counsel are required to use only initials for the minor Plaintiffs in their Court filings. Counsel should anticipate a significant Court sanction if they do not comply in the future. The joint interim status report fails to provide th e basic information required by Local Rule 26-3. Counsel shall review that rule, and file a proper interim status report no later than 10/16/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
J.M.M., et al.,
10
Plaintiff(s),
11
vs.
12
ANDREA HERNANDEZ, et al.,
13
Defendant(s).
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:14-cv-01197-JAD-NJK
ORDER
15
It should not be difficult for counsel to follow clear Court orders and rules of practice. See, e.g.,
16
Dela Rosa v. Scottsdale Memorial Health Sys., Inc., 136 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir. 1998) (“we expect
17
an attorney practicing law in federal court to become familiar with and follow rules applicable to
18
practice in this court”). The lead Plaintiffs in this case are minors. The Court has previously advised
19
counsel of the requirements of Special Order No. 108, including that only a minor’s initials be provided
20
in Court filings. See Docket Nos. 18, 35; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(3). The Court has warned
21
counsel twice already in this case that the Court expects strict compliance with that requirement in the
22
future, and that failure to do so may result in sanctions. See Docket Nos. 18, 35 (citing Davis v. Clark
23
County Sch. Dist., 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 128937, *5 n.3 (D. Nev. Sept. 9, 2013)). Notwithstanding the
24
above orders, special order, and applicable Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, counsel have yet again filed
25
on the public docket a document revealing the minor Plaintiffs’ full names both in the caption and in
26
the body of the document. Docket No. 57. This is the FINAL warning to counsel. All counsel are
27
required to use only initials for the minor Plaintiffs in their Court filings. Counsel should anticipate a
28
significant Court sanction if they do not comply in the future.
1
In addition, the joint interim status report fails to provide the basic information required by Local
2
Rule 26-3. Counsel shall all review that rule, and file a proper interim status report no later than October
3
16, 2015.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: October 9, 2015
6
7
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?