Duncan v. Donahoe
Filing
12
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons to the Defendant named in the complaint and deliver the summons to the U.S. Marshal for service. After Plaintiff receives copies of the completed USM-285 forms from the U.S. Marshal, she has 2 0 days to file a notice with the court identifying if Defendants were served. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/4/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - hand delivered to USM; USM 285 form mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
ROSE DUNCAN,
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
)
POSTMASTER GENERAL PATRICK
)
DONAHOE
)
)
Defendants
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:14-cv-01229-JCM-GWF
ORDER
Presently before the Court is the matter of Duncan v. Donahoe, case no. 2:14-cv-01229JCM-GWF.
Plaintiff was given an extension of time to effectuate service upon the Defendant. See
16
Order (#10). She now possesses the proper address to effectuate service through the U.S.
17
Marshal’s Office. Good cause showing, a new summons shall be issued to allow the Plaintiff to
18
properly serve the Defendant. Accordingly,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons to the
20
Defendant named in the complaint and deliver the summons to the U.S. Marshal for service. The
21
Clerk of the Court shall send the required USM-285 forms to Plaintiff. Upon receipt of the forms,
22
Plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days to furnish the required USM-285 forms to the U.S. Marshal at
23
333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 2058, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101. After Plaintiff receives copies
24
of the completed USM-285 forms from the U.S. Marshal, she has twenty (20) days to file a notice
25
with the court identifying if Defendants were served.
26
DATED this 4th day of September, 2015.
27
28
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?