Billman Property, LLC v. Bank of America N.A., Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDER that 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part, and the case is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 10 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 Complaint is STRICKEN. Clerk of Court shall close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/15/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
______________________________________
)
)
BILLMAN PROPERTY, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A, INC. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
2:14-cv-01230-RCJ-VCF
ORDER
12
13
This case arises out of the foreclosure of real property. Pending before the Court are two
14
Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 7, 10). First, Defendant Bank of America, N.A. has asked the
15
Court to dismiss for improper service of process, because Plaintiff may not represent itself in this
16
Court, for lack of standing, and for failure to state a claim. Second, Defendant National Default
17
Servicing Corp. has asked the Court to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
18
Bank of America is correct that a business entity such as Plaintiff must be represented by
19
a licensed attorney in federal court. See Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory
20
Council, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1654); United States v. High Country
21
Broad. Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993) (“A corporation may appear in federal court only
22
through licensed counsel.”). Therefore, because the Court cannot acknowledge the pleading
23
filed at ECF No. 1, the Court will strike it and dismiss the case without prejudice. Plaintiff’s
24
1 of 2
1
response, which the Court cannot acknowledge in any case, as it is not filed by licensed counsel,
2
concerns only the merits and fails to address the other three bases for the motion.
CONCLUSION
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED IN
4
5
PART, and the case is dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as
6
7
moot.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint (ECF No. 1) is STRICKEN.
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall close the case.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 15th day September, 2014.
Dated this 25th day ofof October, 2014.
12
13
14
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?