Bell v. U.S. District Court et al

Filing 26

ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 22 Motion to Extend Time, granting nunc pro tunc 24 Motion to Extend Time/Shorten Time regarding response and reply to 7 Petition for Writ. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

CORDALE BELL,

Case No. 2:14-cv-01237-JCM-GWF

10

Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
15
16

This habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the court on motions for
extension of time. Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time to file an answer

17

(ECF NO. 22) and petitioner’s motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of

18

the petition (ECF No. 24) are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

19
DATED: 7 February 2017.
20
21
JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1