Bell v. U.S. District Court et al
ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 22 Motion to Extend Time, granting nunc pro tunc 24 Motion to Extend Time/Shorten Time regarding response and reply to 7 Petition for Writ. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:14-cv-01237-JCM-GWF
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
This habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the court on motions for
extension of time. Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time to file an answer
(ECF NO. 22) and petitioner’s motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of
the petition (ECF No. 24) are both GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
DATED: 7 February 2017.
JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?