Goldsmith, Esq. v. Internal Revenue Service et al
Filing
23
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/12/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
JONATHAN GOLDSMITH, ESQ., an
individual,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, a United )
States Governmental Entity; JPMORGAN
)
CHASE BANK, N.A., a National Association; )
DOE individuals I-X; and ROE corporations I- )
X, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________)
Case No.
2:14-cv-01297-GMN-NJK
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND
DENYING, IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION (DOCKET ENTRY 7)
18
19
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket
20
Entry 7) (the “Motion”). The following parties were present at the August 26, 2014 hearing set by
21
the Court regarding the Motion:
22
(a)
himself;
23
24
Plaintiff Jonathan Goldsmith, Esq., an attorney licensed in Nevada and representing
(b)
Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), appeared by and through its
25
counsel of record, Kent. F. Larsen, Esq., of the law firm of Smith Larsen & Wixom;
26
and,
27
28
(c)
Virginia Cronan Lowe, Esq., of the United States Department of Justice, appeared
on behalf of the United States of America;
1
After reviewing the pleadings and briefs on file in this case related to the Motion, and after
2
hearing the arguments of Plaintiff, Mr. Larsen and Ms. Cronan Lowe at the August 26, 2014 hearing,
3
and good cause appearing therefor,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
5
(1)
6
an injunction to restrain Chase from setting off on the IOLTA account which was
7
maintained at Chase in the name of Jonathan B. Goldsmith, Ltd., a Nevada
8
corporation, as Plaintiff acknowledged at the August 26, 2014 hearing that all funds
9
10
the Motion is denied, without prejudice, as moot, insofar as Plaintiff has requested
had been withdrawn from the IOLTA account;
(2)
11
the Motion is granted pending any final judgment/decision on the issues raised in
Plaintiff’s Complaint, and Chase is precluded (pending such judgment/decision)
12
from reporting Plaintiff, in his personal capacity, to Chexsystems;
13
14
15
16
17
18
(3)
the Motion is granted pending any final judgment/decision on the issues raised in
Plaintiff’s Complaint, and Chase is precluded (pending such judgment/decision)
from setting off on the personal accounts of Plaintiff to satisfy any overdraft/negative
balances in the accounts of Jonathan B. Goldsmith, Ltd., a Nevada corporation;
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65(c) the
19
injunctive relief outlined above is deemed effective only upon Plaintiff posting a bond (or cash
20
21
FIVE HUNDRED
equivalent) with the Clerk of the Court in the amount of $____________________, as required by
($500.00) DOLLARS
Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65(c), for payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered
22
by Defendant Chase, in the event that Defendant Chase is found to have been wrongfully enjoined;
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED this 12th day of September, 2014.
DATED this _____ day of September, 2014.
________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
__________________________________
United States District Court
GLORIA M. NAVARRO
United States District Court Judge
2
1
Approved as to form:
2
3
4
5
\s\ Jonathan B. Goldsmith,
Jonathan B. Goldsmith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11805
617 Hoover Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Plaintiff in Proper Person
6
7
8
Approved as to form:
9
SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM
10
11
12
13
14
\s \Kent F. Larsen, ___
Kent F. Larsen, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 3463
Hills Center Business Park
1935 Village Center Circle
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Atorneys for Defendant
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?