Olvera v. Shafer et al

Filing 81

ORDER re 80 Scheduling Order. In an effort to ensure future compliance and complete understanding of the Local Rules, the Court hereby ORDERS attorneys D. Brian Boggess, Evan Wishengrad, John Mugan, and Michael Lum to file a certification wit h the Court no later than December 1, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-4 and 26-1. Counsel are advised that similar violations in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 GUADALUPE OLVERA, et al., 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 JARED E. SHAFTER, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01298-GMN-NJK ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling 17 Order. Docket No. 79. The proposed discovery plan misstates Local Rule 26-4, in that it provides 18 that requests to extend deadlines in the scheduling order need only be filed 20 days before the 19 discovery cut-off. See Docket No. 79 at 4. Local Rule 26-4 requires that any request to extend 20 deadlines set forth in the scheduling order must be submitted at least 21 days before the subject 21 deadline. For example, any request to extend the deadline for initial expert disclosures must be filed 22 at least 21 days before the expiration of that deadline. Such a request filed only 21 days before the 23 discovery cut-off would be untimely. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 In an effort to ensure future compliance and complete understanding of the Local Rules, the 2 Court hereby ORDERS attorneys D. Brian Boggess, Evan Wishengrad, John Mugan, and Michael 3 Lum to file a certification with the Court no later than December 1, 2014, indicating that they have 4 read and comprehend Local Rules 26-4 and 26-1. Counsel are advised that similar violations in the 5 future may result in the imposition of sanctions. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED: November 21, 2014 8 9 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?