Neaman et al v. Peraza et al

Filing 50

ORDER. It has come to the Court's attention that numerous documents have been filed in this case with a minor's full name. The Court hereby INSTRUCTS the Clerk's Office to change the docket to remove the minor's full name and rep lace it with initials. The Court further ORDERS the parties to familiarize themselves with Rule 5.2(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as Special Order Nos. 108 and 109. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/10/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 SPENCER NEAMAN, et al., 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 EMILSE PERAZA PA-C, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01307-JCM-NJK ORDER 16 It has come to the Court’s attention that numerous documents (including case-initiating 17 documents) have been filed in this case with a minor’s full name. Rule 5.2(a) of the Federal Rules of 18 Civil Procedure, as well as Special Order Nos. 108 and 109, require that only a minor’s initials be 19 provided. Accordingly, the Court hereby INSTRUCTS the Clerk’s Office to change the docket in this 20 case to remove the minor’s full name and replace it with initials. The Court further ORDERS the 21 parties to familiarize themselves the above directives, and to fully comply with them in the future. The 22 failure to comply may result in sanctions. See, e.g., Davis v. Clark County Sch. Dist., 2013 U.S. Dist. 23 Lexis 128937, *5 n.3 (D. Nev. Sept. 9, 2013) (sanctioning counsel for repeated failure to comply with 24 Court orders, including order to use only minor’s initials in filings). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: December 10, 2015 27 28 ______________________________________ ________________________ ___ NANCY J. KOPPE Y KOPPE OP P United States Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge gistr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?