Kriehn v. United States Department of Transportation

Filing 4

ORDER Adopting 2 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Complaint 3 is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/6/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Jess H. Kriehn, 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 vs. United States Department of Transportation, 7 Defendant. 8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-1311-GMN-PAL ORDER 9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States 10 11 Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen, (ECF No. 2), which states that Plaintiff Jess Kriehn’s 12 Complaint, (ECF No. 3), should be dismissed. 13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 14 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 15 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 16 determination of those portions of the Report to which objections are made. Id. The Court may 17 accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the 18 Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). 19 No objections to Judge Leen’s R&R were filed, and the deadline to object has now 20 expired. Accordingly, the Court finds good cause to accept and adopt the findings of Judge 21 Leen. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 2), is ADOPTED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint, (ECF No. 3), is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. DATED this 6th day of April, 2015. 6 7 8 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?