Prall v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 20

ORDER granting #18 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF Document 18 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 6 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 SPO Vaughn A. Crawford Nevada Bar No. 7665 Jay J. Schuttert Nevada Bar No. 8656 Morgan T. Petrelli Nevada Bar No. 13221 SNELL & V/ILMER l,r..p, 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email: vcrawford@swlaw.com Email: jschuttert@swlaw.com Email: mpetrelli@swlaw.com Attomeys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 10 o : E h H, ;^ (.IJt -€ ìã Él ø14^ I -1 I| 1l UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT l2 DISTRICT OF'NEVADA 13 MARILYN ELLEN PRALL, CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF Plaintift > I eãsi i> tÀú+ t4 oo I >*gs -r I l5òs l5 VS v)' o *" l6 FORD MOTOR COMPANY and ROE COMPONENT PART MANUFACTURER, It d-o: U J U4êr t7 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendants. 18 t9 In order to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of certain confidential, commercial 20 andlor proprietary documents and information produced or to be produced by FORD MOTOR 2t 22 COMPANY ("Ford") in this action, it is ordered that: 1. Documents to be produced by Ford in this litigation that contain confidential, 23 commercially sensitive and/or proprietary information shall hereafter be referred to as "Protected 24 Documents." A document or portion of a document that Ford determines in good faith to be a 25 Protected Document may be designated as confidential by marking or placing the applicable 26 notice "Subject to Protective Order," "Confidential," or substantially similar language on media 27 containing Protected Documents, on the document itselt or on a copy of the document, in such a 28 Case 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF Document 18 Filed 03/11/15 Page 2 of 6 I way that it does not obscure the text or other content of the document. 2. 2 As used in this Order, the term "documents" means all written material, videotapes J and all other tangible items, produced in whatever format (e.g., hard copy, electronic, digital, 4 etc.) and on whatever media (e.g,, hard copy, videotape, computer diskette, CD-ROM, DVD, hard 5 drive or otherwise). 6 3. Any document or any information designated as "Subject to Protective Order," 7 "Confidential," or substantially similar language in accordance with the provisions of this Order I shall only be used, shown or disclosed as provided in this Order. However, nothing in this Order 9 shall limit a party's use or disclosure of his or her own information designated as Confidential l0 o z Material. 4. 1l If a party disagrees with the "Protected" designation of any document, the party written letter, within 30 days of receipt of the confidential documents and t2 will l3 information, identifying the challenged document(s) with specificity, including Bates-number(s) c EË>1 t4 where available, r 2ãs3 I i)o5 I 10 15 challenged document(s), Ford I t6 purpose of establishing that the challenged document(s) is/are confidential. Any document so t7 marked as "Protected" 18 to its confidential status. d ti c.) ! I I ) ..e 3s I n9xs I O:<N 5 : äsäË oU q) V) lol 13 so notify Ford in If a the parties are unable to resolve the issue of confidentiality regarding the will thereafter timely apply to this Court to set a hearing for the o f T9 5, will continue to be treated as such pending determination by the Court as Protected Documents and any copies thereof received pursuant to paragraph 6 20 below shall be maintained confidential by the receiving party, his/her attorney, other 2t representatives, and expert witnesses, and shall be used only for preparation for the trial of this 22 matter, subject to the limitations set forth herein. 23 24 6. Protected Documents shall be disclosed only to "Qualified Persons." Qualified Persons are limited to: 26 a. b. 27 involved in the preparation andlor trial of this action; 28 c. 25 Counsel of Record for the parties, and the parties; Non-technical and clerical staff employed by Counsel of Record and for the Experts and non-attorney consultants retained by the parties -2- Case 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF Document 18 Filed 03/11/15 Page 3 of 6 1 preparation andlor trial of this case, provided that no disclosure shall be made to 2 any expert or consultant who is employed by a competitor of Ford; 4 d. e. 5 consultants retained 6 involving a 2003 Ford Taurus and the same allegations asserted in this 7 provided no disclosure shall be made to any expert or consultant who is employed 8 by a competitor of Ford. J 9 10 o : 11 7. The Court, the Court's staff, witnesses, and the jury in this case; and Attomeys representing Plaintiff and the experts and non-attorney by such attorneys in other cases pending against Ford case, Plaintiffls Counsel must make reasonable efforts to ensure the individuals described in paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above are Qualified Persons, 8. Before receiving access to any Protected Document or the information contained in paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above shall execute a "Written t2 therein, each person described l3 Assurance" in the form contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Counsel for Plaintiff shall retain t4 each such executed Written Assurance and shall keep a list identifying (a) all persons described in Ø r z3s3 I :Ðo5 15 paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above to whom Protected Documents have been disclosed, and (b) all Êl 4e v)' o ;' T6 Protected Documents disclosed to such persons. Each such executed V/ritten Assurance and list t7 shall be submitted to counsel for Ford at the termination of this litigation or upon Order of the 18 Court requiring production, whichever comes t9 not designated as testifying experts, Plaintiffs counsel may redact the name, address, 20 signature of the consultant before disclosing the executed Exhibit 2T person. To the extent the "Qualiflred Persons" described in paragraph 6(c) or 6(e) above include 22 privileged non-testifying expert consultants, Counsel for Plaintiff shall retain each such executed 23 Exhibit A and shall keep a list identifying (a) all such non-testifying expert consultants described 24 in paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above to whom Protected Documents have been disclosed, and (b) all 25 Protected Documents disclosed to such persons. In the event that Ford seeks to compel the 26 production of each unredacted and executed Exhibit A for good cause, Counsel for Plaintiff shall 27 submit each unredacted and executed Exhibit 28 Persons described in paragraph 6(b) shall be covered under the signature of Counsel of Record. d b l^i , A^ -€ u../ I trl Ë ìã > I| sÈx= È: eisã Ë;eå L/ J UA:r -.1 c')t :> T first, A -3- However, for consulting experts who were A and and document list for that and list to the Court for in camera inspection. Case 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF Document 18 Filed 03/11/15 Page 4 of 6 1 9. As the Protected Documents may only be distributed to Qualified Persons, ) Plaintiffs Counsel, and all persons described in paragraph 6 above, này not post J Documents on any website or internet accessible document repository and shall not under any 4 circumstance sell, offer for sale, advertise, or publicize either the Protected Documents and the 5 Confidential information contained therein or the fact that such persons have obtained Ford's 6 Protected Do cuments and Confidential information. 7 10. Protected To the extent that Protected Documents or information obtained therefrom are 8 9 z D H, !J I h A.o trl ìã 5 I -¿<^ shall remain subject to the provisions of this Order, along with the transcript pages of the l0 o used in the taking of depositions and/or used as exhibits aI trial, such documents or information deposition testimony andlor trial testimony dealing with, referring to or referencing the Protected 11 Documents or information. t2 11. In conjunction with filing any documents with the Court that contain any portion 13 of any Protected Document or information taken from any Protected Document, the flrling party 5lËixi t4 must file a motion for an order sealing the documents consistent with the Ninth Circuit opinions oo I >EsS I {i¡ìs 15 of Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu,447 F.3d I 172, lI78-79 (9th Cir. 2006) and Pintos I6 v. Pacific Creditors Association, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (gth Cir. 2010) and consistent with Local t7 Rule 10-5(b). A copy of the motion to seal must be served on all parties, who have appeared in 18 the case. t9 Protected Document under seal. The parties agree that any motion 20 ensure that the only information withheld from public inspection 2l authorized by 22 resolved before any Protected Document or any document containing or referencing 23 with the Court. For any item of any Protected Document which a designation dispute has not 24 been resolved, that item and any document containing or referencing 25 least provisionally), pursuant to local court practice or in a sealed envelope or other appropriate 26 sealed container on which shall be endorsed the title 27 indication of the nature of the contents of such sealed envelope or other container, the phrase 28 "subject To Protective Order," and a statement substantially in the following U J gA¡F - 00)I :' Él ;' u)' vs o T I I 'When filing the motion, the filing party will cite to the Court the grounds for filing any will be n¿urow in scope to is information expressly law. Whenever possible, disputes regarding confidentiality designations should be 4- it is filed it will be filed under seal (at of the action to which it pertains, form: an "This Case 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF Document 18 Filed 03/11/15 Page 5 of 6 I envelope or container shall not be opened without order of the Court, except by officers of the 2 Court and counsel of record, who, after reviewing the contents, shall return them to the clerk in a J sealed envelope or container." 12. 4 Any attorney wishing to file or submit to the Court any Protected Document, ot 5 any affidavits, memoranda, exhibits or other papers containing or making reference to Protected 6 Document, then such attorney shall first consider whether redacting portions of such materials 7 that contain or refer to confidential information is practical and will protect the Protected 8 Document while leaving other non-confidential information meaningful, as required by Foltz 9 State Farm 10 13, 11 E L) c)l Êl 5 | h '.s ìã Él 4z v)' o ;' I å of such Any court reporter or transcriber who reports or transcribes testimony in this T2 action shall agree that all "confidential" information designated as such under this Order shall l3 remain "confidential" and shall not be disclosed by them, except pursuant to the terms of this T4 Order, and that any notes or transcriptions of such testimony (and any accompanying exhibits) 15 will ,'-{ I -¿<^ a:OX 3r'H3ãl r/ J U@Êr Ø r zäp8 r I a-/ir OI :; so, redacted versions materials shall be hled with the Court according to the standard filing procedures. Ò : Mut Auto. Ins. Co.,331 F.3d ll22 (gth Cir. 2003). If v. be retained by the reporter or delivered to counsel of record. 14. t6 Counsel for the parties shall not be required to return the Protected Documents to t7 Ford after the conclusion of this case and may retain the documents pursuant to the terms of this 18 Order. t9 15. To the extent Ford is requested to produce documents it feels should not be subject 20 to the sharing provisions of this protective order, Ford does not waive and specifically reserves its 2l right to subsequently request that the parties enter into a non-sharing protective order prior to the 22 production of any such documents. 23 16. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents or information containing 24 confidential information which should have been designated as Protected Document(s) shall not 25 be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of the party's claims of confidentiality. 26 17. This Protective Order may not be waived, modified, abandoned or terminated, in If 27 whole or part, except by an instrument in writing signed by the parties. 28 Protective Order shall be held invalid for any reason whatsoever, the remaining provisions shall -5- any provision of this Case 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF Document 18 Filed 03/11/15 Page 6 of 6 1 not be affected thereby. 18. 2 After termination of this litigation, the provisions of this Order shall continue to be J binding. This Court retains and shall have jurisdiction over the parties and recipients of the 4 Protected Documents for enforcement of the provisions of this Order following termination o 5 this litigation. 19. 6 This Protective Order shall be binding upon the parties hereto, upon their the parties' and their attorneys' 7 attomeys, and upon 8 representatives, administrators, heirs, legal representatives, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, 9 employees, agents, independent contractors, or other persons 10 Respectfully submitted this 11 E È q.) I ! ) | .-9 l3a I I nl¡= 9ãSi T4 J UDêÈ "ã I <gó3 q) | -re lol V) t2 13 lf3 15 t6 or organizations over which they have control. a : successors, executors, personal -I$u, of March, 2015. L.L.P By: By: NV Bar o.7665 Vaughn A. NV Bar No. 8656 Ja J.S T. i, NV Bar No. 13221 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Ford Motor Company Seth R. 801 South Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorney for Plaintiff o I t7 ORDER 18 t9 IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of March,2015 20 2t U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?