Layton v. Green Valley Village Community Association, et al

Filing 131

ORDER Granting 130 Stipulated Discovery Plan. Discovery due by 5/24/2024. Motions due by 6/24/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/24/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 11/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174 Email: ljs@semenzarickard.com Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203 Email: jlr@semenzarickard.com Katie L. Cannata, Esq., Bar No. 14848 Email: klc@semenzarickard.com SEMENZA RICKARD LAW 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 Facsimile: (702) 920-8669 Attorneys for Defendants Green Valley Village Community Association, Assured Real Estate, Inc., and Joseph Yakubik SEMENZA RICKARD LAW 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 THOMAS LAYTON, Case No. 2:14-cv-01347-GMN-EJY Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 GREEN VALLEY VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, a Nevada not for profit Corporation dba GREEN VALLEY VILLAGE HOA; ASSURED REAL ESTATE, INC., a Nevada Corporation; JOSEPH YAKUBIK, an individual; DOES I-X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATION XI-XX, inclusive, 17 18 19 20 21 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER Defendants. 22 23 Defendants Green Valley Village Community Association dba Green Valley Village 24 HOA (“GVV”) and Assured Real Estate, Inc. (“Assured”) (together "Defendants") and Plaintiff 25 Thomas Layton ("Plaintiff") (together, the "Parties"), Plaintiff In Pro Per and Defendants by and 26 through their undersigned counsel of record, submit their Stipulated Discovery Plan and 27 Scheduling Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, as well as LR 16-1 and 28 26-1. 1 1. 1 2 meeting was conducted on November 14, 2023, and was attended by Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq. of 3 the law firm of Semenza Rickard Law for Defendants, and Plaintiff Pro Per Thomas Layton. 2. 4 Statement of Nature and Complexity of Case: A. 5 Plaintiff's Statement: 6 The Plaintiff comes before the Court to remedy Defendant's violations of the Fair Debt 7 Collection Practices Act, FDCPA, and of related Nevada law requirements. Plaintiff seeks, via a 8 jury trial, to recover both actual and statutory damages along with reasonable attorney fees and 9 costs. Plaintiff is now Pro Per as his prior counsel took new employment with the Arizona 10 SEMENZA RICKARD LAW 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 Rule 26(f) Conference: Pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and LR 26-1(a), a telephonic Public Defenders office. 11 Since 2004, the Plaintiff has been a resident and member of Green Valley Village 12 Community Association, dba Green Valley Village HOA, whose daily operations are overseen 13 and managed by Assured Real Estate Inc. Both parties are named Defendants in this case. Prior to January 28, 2011, Plaintiff received numerous confusing and varied demands for 14 15 payment from Defendants. 16 correction and validated of the various demands for payment. Defendant failed to comply with 17 FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq. To date, Defendant has made multiple attempts to collect a non-existant or erroneous debt 18 19 thru various demands and legal actions. Plaintiff now brings four claims against Defendant; various FDCPA violations, Invasion 20 21 Plaintiff provided the proper written notices to Defendants for of Privacy, Gross Negligence, and Civil Conspiracy. B. 22 Defendants' Statement: 23 Defendants deny Plaintiff’s allegations. On September 9, 2022, the Court dismissed all 24 of Plaintiff’s claims except for his FDCPA claim against GVV and Assured. GVV and Assured 25 deny that they are “debt collectors” within the meaning of the FDCPA. Additionally, GVV and 26 Assured deny any wrongdoing and assert that all notifications provided to Plaintiff were proper. 27 Defendants seek an award of attorneys fees and costs for having to defend against Plaintiff’s 28 claims. 2 3. 1 2 to a trial before the Magistrate Judge. Defendants do not consent to a trial by the Magistrate 3 Judge or the use of the Short Trial Program at this time. The Parties also certify that they 4 conferred regarding alternative dispute resolution. At this time, the Parties decline a settlement 5 conference. 4. 6 Areas of Discovery: Discovery will be needed on the following subjects: The 7 remaining claim set forth in Complaint, as well as the affirmative defenses raised by Defendants 8 relevant to the action. There are no proposed limitations of discovery at this time. 5. 9 10 SEMENZA RICKARD LAW 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 Magistrate/ADR: The Parties certify that they have conferred and Plaintiff agrees (30) days of the FRCP 26(f) conference, pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)(C). 6. 11 12 13 14 15 Initial Disclosures: The Parties will provide their initial disclosures within thirty Discovery Plan: The Parties jointly propose to the Court the following discovery plan: a. Discovery Cut-Off Date: The Parties have agreed to a discovery period of 180 days. All discovery must be completed by May 24, 2024. b. Amending the Pleadings and Adding Parties: The Parties will file any 16 motion to amend pleadings or add parties on or before February 23, 2024, which is not later 17 than ninety (90) days prior to the close of discovery. 18 c. FRCP 26(a)(2) Disclosures of Experts: Disclosure of experts, if any, shall 19 proceed as follows: 20 before March 22, 2024, which is at least sixty (60) days before the discovery cut-off date. 21 Plaintiff and Defendant shall disclose their rebuttal experts on or before April 25, 2024, which is 22 at least thirty (30) days after the initial date for disclosure of experts. Further each party agrees 23 to make their experts available for deposition, and facilitate the same, prior to discovery cut-off. 24 25 26 d. Plaintiff and Defendant shall disclose their experts to each other on or Dispositive Motions: The date for filing dispositive motions will be on or before June 24, 2024, which is not later than thirty (30) days after the discovery cut-off date. e. Pre-trial order: The Parties shall file the joint pretrial order on or before 27 July 24, 2024, which is not later than (30) days after the date set for filing dispositive motions. 28 In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be 3 1 suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive motions or further order of the 2 Court. f. 3 4 shall be made in the joint pretrial order, which is to be filed no later than thirty (30) days before 5 the trial date set by this Court. g. 6 Extension or Modification of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order: 7 The Parties will make any stipulation or motion no later than twenty-one (21) days before the 8 discovery cut-off date and comply with LR 26-4, which is May 3, 2024. 7. 9 SEMENZA RICKARD LAW 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 FRCP 26(a)(3) Disclosures: The disclosures required by FRCP 26(a)(3) Preservation of Discoverable Evidence: The Parties hereby agree to preserve for 10 the purposes of this litigation any and all relevant evidence, including documents and other 11 tangible things. 12 8. Electronically Stored Information: Production format for all electronically stored 13 information (ESI) shall be in portable document files (PDF), unless converting a document to 14 PDF is impossible or otherwise impracticable. Discoverable information shall be submitted 15 either via U.S. Mail on CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or another universally accessible media storage 16 device, via electronic mail or via a file share link so as to minimize the burden and costs 17 associated with excessive paper discovery. 18 production of materials in regard to the metadata if necessary and within fourteen (14) days of 19 any party’s request. 9. 20 The Parties agree to reconvene to discuss the Privilege Issues: Issues concerning attorney-client privilege, work product, and 21 proprietary material are possible, but not anticipated. The Parties will meet and confer should 22 any issues arise prior to involving the Court. 10. 23 Discovery related orders: A protective order may be appropriate in this case to 24 protect the confidential and proprietary information of the Parties. If so, the Parties will prepare 25 a proposed stipulated order for the Court’s consideration. This order will include procedures for 26 dealing with inadvertently produced confidential documents that follow the procedure set forth in 27 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B) and FRE 502(b). 28 /// 4 1 2 3 What Changes Should be Made in The Limitations on Discovery Imposed Under These Rules or by Local Rules, and What Other Limitations Should be Imposed: None. 12. Any Other Orders That Should be Issued Under Rule 26(c) or Under Rule 16(B) 4 and (C): The Parties agree to email service. All service made to Plaintiff shall be made to 5 tlaytonent@gmail.com. 6 jlr@semenzarickard.com and klc@semenzarickard.com. Separate email service is not necessary 7 for documents filed via the ECF system. 8 DATED this 28th day of November, 2023. DATED this 28th day of November, 2023. 9 SEMENZA RICKARD LAW PRO PER /s/ Jarrod L. Rickard _________ Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174 Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203 Katie L. Cannata, Esq., Bar No. 14848 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 /s/ Tom Layton ________________ Thomas R. Layton 29 Myrtle Beach Drive Henderson, NV 89074 Pro Per 10 SEMENZA RICKARD LAW 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 835-6803 11. 11 12 13 All service made to Defendants shall be made 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants Green Valley Village Community Association, Assured Real Estate, Inc., and Joseph Yakubik 18 19 SCHEDULING ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 ______________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 22 November 28, 2023 Dated: ________________________________ 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 to

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?