Layton v. Green Valley Village Community Association, et al
Filing
131
ORDER Granting 130 Stipulated Discovery Plan. Discovery due by 5/24/2024. Motions due by 6/24/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/24/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 11/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174
Email: ljs@semenzarickard.com
Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203
Email: jlr@semenzarickard.com
Katie L. Cannata, Esq., Bar No. 14848
Email: klc@semenzarickard.com
SEMENZA RICKARD LAW
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
Facsimile: (702) 920-8669
Attorneys for Defendants Green Valley
Village Community Association,
Assured Real Estate, Inc., and
Joseph Yakubik
SEMENZA RICKARD LAW
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
THOMAS LAYTON,
Case No. 2:14-cv-01347-GMN-EJY
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16
GREEN VALLEY VILLAGE COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada not for profit
Corporation dba GREEN VALLEY
VILLAGE HOA; ASSURED REAL ESTATE,
INC., a Nevada Corporation; JOSEPH
YAKUBIK, an individual; DOES I-X,
inclusive; and ROE CORPORATION XI-XX,
inclusive,
17
18
19
20
21
JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN AND
PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER
Defendants.
22
23
Defendants Green Valley Village Community Association dba Green Valley Village
24
HOA (“GVV”) and Assured Real Estate, Inc. (“Assured”) (together "Defendants") and Plaintiff
25
Thomas Layton ("Plaintiff") (together, the "Parties"), Plaintiff In Pro Per and Defendants by and
26
through their undersigned counsel of record, submit their Stipulated Discovery Plan and
27
Scheduling Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, as well as LR 16-1 and
28
26-1.
1
1.
1
2
meeting was conducted on November 14, 2023, and was attended by Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq. of
3
the law firm of Semenza Rickard Law for Defendants, and Plaintiff Pro Per Thomas Layton.
2.
4
Statement of Nature and Complexity of Case:
A.
5
Plaintiff's Statement:
6
The Plaintiff comes before the Court to remedy Defendant's violations of the Fair Debt
7
Collection Practices Act, FDCPA, and of related Nevada law requirements. Plaintiff seeks, via a
8
jury trial, to recover both actual and statutory damages along with reasonable attorney fees and
9
costs. Plaintiff is now Pro Per as his prior counsel took new employment with the Arizona
10
SEMENZA RICKARD LAW
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
Rule 26(f) Conference: Pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and LR 26-1(a), a telephonic
Public Defenders office.
11
Since 2004, the Plaintiff has been a resident and member of Green Valley Village
12
Community Association, dba Green Valley Village HOA, whose daily operations are overseen
13
and managed by Assured Real Estate Inc. Both parties are named Defendants in this case.
Prior to January 28, 2011, Plaintiff received numerous confusing and varied demands for
14
15
payment from Defendants.
16
correction and validated of the various demands for payment. Defendant failed to comply with
17
FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq.
To date, Defendant has made multiple attempts to collect a non-existant or erroneous debt
18
19
thru various demands and legal actions.
Plaintiff now brings four claims against Defendant; various FDCPA violations, Invasion
20
21
Plaintiff provided the proper written notices to Defendants for
of Privacy, Gross Negligence, and Civil Conspiracy.
B.
22
Defendants' Statement:
23
Defendants deny Plaintiff’s allegations. On September 9, 2022, the Court dismissed all
24
of Plaintiff’s claims except for his FDCPA claim against GVV and Assured. GVV and Assured
25
deny that they are “debt collectors” within the meaning of the FDCPA. Additionally, GVV and
26
Assured deny any wrongdoing and assert that all notifications provided to Plaintiff were proper.
27
Defendants seek an award of attorneys fees and costs for having to defend against Plaintiff’s
28
claims.
2
3.
1
2
to a trial before the Magistrate Judge. Defendants do not consent to a trial by the Magistrate
3
Judge or the use of the Short Trial Program at this time. The Parties also certify that they
4
conferred regarding alternative dispute resolution. At this time, the Parties decline a settlement
5
conference.
4.
6
Areas of Discovery: Discovery will be needed on the following subjects: The
7
remaining claim set forth in Complaint, as well as the affirmative defenses raised by Defendants
8
relevant to the action. There are no proposed limitations of discovery at this time.
5.
9
10
SEMENZA RICKARD LAW
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
Magistrate/ADR: The Parties certify that they have conferred and Plaintiff agrees
(30) days of the FRCP 26(f) conference, pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)(C).
6.
11
12
13
14
15
Initial Disclosures: The Parties will provide their initial disclosures within thirty
Discovery Plan: The Parties jointly propose to the Court the following discovery
plan:
a.
Discovery Cut-Off Date: The Parties have agreed to a discovery period of
180 days. All discovery must be completed by May 24, 2024.
b.
Amending the Pleadings and Adding Parties: The Parties will file any
16
motion to amend pleadings or add parties on or before February 23, 2024, which is not later
17
than ninety (90) days prior to the close of discovery.
18
c.
FRCP 26(a)(2) Disclosures of Experts: Disclosure of experts, if any, shall
19
proceed as follows:
20
before March 22, 2024, which is at least sixty (60) days before the discovery cut-off date.
21
Plaintiff and Defendant shall disclose their rebuttal experts on or before April 25, 2024, which is
22
at least thirty (30) days after the initial date for disclosure of experts. Further each party agrees
23
to make their experts available for deposition, and facilitate the same, prior to discovery cut-off.
24
25
26
d.
Plaintiff and Defendant shall disclose their experts to each other on or
Dispositive Motions: The date for filing dispositive motions will be on or
before June 24, 2024, which is not later than thirty (30) days after the discovery cut-off date.
e.
Pre-trial order: The Parties shall file the joint pretrial order on or before
27
July 24, 2024, which is not later than (30) days after the date set for filing dispositive motions.
28
In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be
3
1
suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive motions or further order of the
2
Court.
f.
3
4
shall be made in the joint pretrial order, which is to be filed no later than thirty (30) days before
5
the trial date set by this Court.
g.
6
Extension or Modification of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order:
7
The Parties will make any stipulation or motion no later than twenty-one (21) days before the
8
discovery cut-off date and comply with LR 26-4, which is May 3, 2024.
7.
9
SEMENZA RICKARD LAW
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
FRCP 26(a)(3) Disclosures: The disclosures required by FRCP 26(a)(3)
Preservation of Discoverable Evidence: The Parties hereby agree to preserve for
10
the purposes of this litigation any and all relevant evidence, including documents and other
11
tangible things.
12
8.
Electronically Stored Information: Production format for all electronically stored
13
information (ESI) shall be in portable document files (PDF), unless converting a document to
14
PDF is impossible or otherwise impracticable. Discoverable information shall be submitted
15
either via U.S. Mail on CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or another universally accessible media storage
16
device, via electronic mail or via a file share link so as to minimize the burden and costs
17
associated with excessive paper discovery.
18
production of materials in regard to the metadata if necessary and within fourteen (14) days of
19
any party’s request.
9.
20
The Parties agree to reconvene to discuss the
Privilege Issues: Issues concerning attorney-client privilege, work product, and
21
proprietary material are possible, but not anticipated. The Parties will meet and confer should
22
any issues arise prior to involving the Court.
10.
23
Discovery related orders: A protective order may be appropriate in this case to
24
protect the confidential and proprietary information of the Parties. If so, the Parties will prepare
25
a proposed stipulated order for the Court’s consideration. This order will include procedures for
26
dealing with inadvertently produced confidential documents that follow the procedure set forth in
27
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B) and FRE 502(b).
28
///
4
1
2
3
What Changes Should be Made in The Limitations on Discovery Imposed Under
These Rules or by Local Rules, and What Other Limitations Should be Imposed: None.
12.
Any Other Orders That Should be Issued Under Rule 26(c) or Under Rule 16(B)
4
and (C): The Parties agree to email service. All service made to Plaintiff shall be made to
5
tlaytonent@gmail.com.
6
jlr@semenzarickard.com and klc@semenzarickard.com. Separate email service is not necessary
7
for documents filed via the ECF system.
8
DATED this 28th day of November, 2023.
DATED this 28th day of November, 2023.
9
SEMENZA RICKARD LAW
PRO PER
/s/ Jarrod L. Rickard _________
Lawrence J. Semenza, III, Esq., Bar No. 7174
Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., Bar No. 10203
Katie L. Cannata, Esq., Bar No. 14848
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
/s/ Tom Layton ________________
Thomas R. Layton
29 Myrtle Beach Drive
Henderson, NV 89074
Pro Per
10
SEMENZA RICKARD LAW
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 835-6803
11.
11
12
13
All
service
made
to
Defendants
shall
be
made
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants Green Valley
Village Community Association,
Assured Real Estate, Inc., and
Joseph Yakubik
18
19
SCHEDULING ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
______________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
22
November 28, 2023
Dated: ________________________________
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
to
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?