Lemus v. Olaveson et al

Filing 8

ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendant shall file Certificates of Interested Parties by 9/12/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/5/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 JHONNY D. LEMUS, 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 ROBERT J. OLVAVESON, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01381-JCM-NJK ORDER 16 This matter is before the Court on the failure of Plaintiff and Defendant Robert Olaveson to file 17 Certificates of Interested Parties. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except 18 habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify 19 in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, 20 partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in 21 the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties, other 22 than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) 23 requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that 24 this rule requires. To date, Plaintiff and Defendant Robert Olaveson have failed to comply. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendant Robert Olaveson shall file 2 Certificates of Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1, no later than 4:00 p.m., 3 September 12, 2014. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why 4 sanctions should not be imposed. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: September 5, 2014 7 8 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?