Green v. LeGrand et al
Filing
52
ORDER. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that 47 petitioner's motion to file a surreply is GRANTED such that petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from entry of this order within which to file a surreply on 14 respondents' motion to dism iss. Respondents shall have fourteen (14) days from service to file a surrebuttal. Neither surreply nor surrebuttal shall exceed ten (10) pages. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
DUSHON NICHALOS GREEN,
8
Case No. 2:14-cv-01388-APG-NJK
Petitioner,
ORDER
9
vs.
10
11
ROBERT LEGRAND, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
This habeas action by a Nevada state inmate comes before the Court on petitioner's motion
15
(ECF No. 47) to file a surreply.
16
The Court will grant petitioner’s motion out of an abundance of caution, subject to the provisos
17
herein. The grant of the motion does not signify acceptance or rejection of any of the parties’
18
arguments on the motion. The Court simply is exercising its discretion to allow a surreply. No further
19
briefing will be allowed beyond a surreply and surrebuttal; and, as with the usual briefing cycle,
20
respondents have the opportunity to file the last brief directed to their pending motion to dismiss.
21
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 47) to file a surreply is
22
GRANTED such that petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from entry of this order within which
23
to file a surreply on respondents’ motion (ECF No. 14) to dismiss. Respondents shall have fourteen
24
(14) days from service to file a surrebuttal. Neither surreply nor surrebuttal shall exceed ten (10) pages.
25
DATED: October 6, 2016.
26
27
28
__________________________________
ANDREW P. GORDON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?