Green v. LeGrand et al

Filing 52

ORDER. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that 47 petitioner's motion to file a surreply is GRANTED such that petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from entry of this order within which to file a surreply on 14 respondents' motion to dism iss. Respondents shall have fourteen (14) days from service to file a surrebuttal. Neither surreply nor surrebuttal shall exceed ten (10) pages. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 DUSHON NICHALOS GREEN, 8 Case No. 2:14-cv-01388-APG-NJK Petitioner, ORDER 9 vs. 10 11 ROBERT LEGRAND, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 This habeas action by a Nevada state inmate comes before the Court on petitioner's motion 15 (ECF No. 47) to file a surreply. 16 The Court will grant petitioner’s motion out of an abundance of caution, subject to the provisos 17 herein. The grant of the motion does not signify acceptance or rejection of any of the parties’ 18 arguments on the motion. The Court simply is exercising its discretion to allow a surreply. No further 19 briefing will be allowed beyond a surreply and surrebuttal; and, as with the usual briefing cycle, 20 respondents have the opportunity to file the last brief directed to their pending motion to dismiss. 21 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 47) to file a surreply is 22 GRANTED such that petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from entry of this order within which 23 to file a surreply on respondents’ motion (ECF No. 14) to dismiss. Respondents shall have fourteen 24 (14) days from service to file a surrebuttal. Neither surreply nor surrebuttal shall exceed ten (10) pages. 25 DATED: October 6, 2016. 26 27 28 __________________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?