Cepero v. Williams et al
Filing
4
ORDER 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. The Clerk shall file and electronically serve the petition upon respondents. Petitioner shall have 30 days to show cause and file such proof he may have to demonstrate t hat his appeal before the Nevada Supreme Court has been decided. if petitioner is unable to demonstrate that he has exhausted his state remedies, the Court will enter an order dismissing the petition. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
BILLY CEPERO,
10
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
11
12
Case No. 2:14-cv-01396-MMD-GWF
BRIAN WILLIAM, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
15
Petitioner Billy Cepero has submitted a petition for writ of habeas corpus,
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (dkt. No. 1-1). While petitioner submitted an application to
17
proceed in forma pauperis (dkt. No. 1), he subsequently paid the filing fee (see dkt. No.
18
3).
19
In his purported federal petition, petitioner references an application for
20
postconviction relief that appears to be pending before the Nevada Supreme Court.
21
Further, the Court may take judicial notice of the Nevada Supreme Court docket, which
22
appears to reflect that briefing is in progress with respect to petitioner’s appeal of the
23
denial of his state postconviction petition (see Case. No. 65785). Accordingly, petitioner
24
shall have thirty (30) days from the entry of this order to show cause and file such proof
25
he may have to demonstrate that the Nevada Supreme Court has decided his appeal.
26
Petitioner shall specify the date of the Nevada Supreme Court’s adjudication of the
27
appeal and file a copy of the decision on appeal and the remittitur, if possible. If
28
petitioner has an appeal pending before the Nevada Supreme Court, then this petition
1
for a writ of habeas corpus may be dismissed based on failure to exhaust state
2
remedies.
3
4
5
6
It is therefore ordered that petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis
(dkt. no. 1) is denied as moot.
It is further ordered that the Clerk shall detach, file and electronically serve the
petition (dkt. no. 1-1) upon the respondents.
7
It is further ordered that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the entry of this
8
order to show cause and file such proof he may have to demonstrate that his appeal
9
before the Nevada Supreme Court has been decided.
10
11
12
13
14
It is further ordered that if petitioner files such proof, respondents shall have
twenty (20) days to file a response to petitioner’s proof.
It is further ordered that if petitioner is unable to demonstrate that he has
exhausted his state remedies, the Court will enter an order dismissing the petition.
DATED THIS 10th day of November 2014.
15
16
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?