Cepero v. Williams et al

Filing 41

ORDER that Petitioner's pro se motion for reconsideration ECF No. 34 , motion to present additional supporting evidence ECF No. 36 , and motion for extension of time ECF No. 39 be stricken as fugitive documents. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

BILLY CEPERO,

8

Case No. 2:14-cv-01396-MMD-GWF
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
9
BRIAN WILLIAM, et al.,
10
Respondents.
11
12

On January 22, 2018, this Court granted Respondents’ motion to dismiss Billy

13

Cepero’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition with prejudice as time-barred (ECF

14

No. 32). Judgment was entered (ECF No. 33). Despite being represented by counsel,

15

Cepero has filed, pro se, a motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 34) and a motion to

16

present additional supporting evidence (ECF No. 36) as well as a motion for extension of

17

time (ECF No. 39). Once an attorney has made an appearance on behalf of a party, the

18

party may not personally file any document with the court. LR IA 11-6. Cepero’s attorney

19

has not withdrawn from this case. Cepero’s filings are fugitive documents not properly

20

before the court. As with a fugitive motion that Cepero filed earlier in this case, the court

21

strikes these three motions.

22

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s pro se motion for reconsideration (ECF

23

No. 34); motion to present additional supporting evidence (ECF No. 36); and motion for

24

extension of time (ECF No. 39) be stricken as fugitive documents.

25

DATED THIS 5th day of November 2018.

26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE