Cepero v. Williams et al
Filing
51
ORDER that denies certificate of appealability as to Petitioner's motion for reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
BILLY CEPERO,
10
Case No. 2:14-cv-01396-MMD-GWF
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
11
BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
This Court dismissed Petitioner Billy Cepero’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus
15
petition as untimely (ECF No. 32), and judgment was entered (ECF No. 33).
16
Subsequently, the Court denied Petitioner’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion
17
for reconsideration (ECF No. 46).
18
The Court now considers whether to issue or deny a certificate of appealability
19
(“COA”). See Lynch v. Blodgett, 999 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1993) (certificate of probable
20
cause to appeal necessary to appeal denial of post-judgment motion for relief under Rule
21
60(b)). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a COA may issue only when the petitioner
22
“has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” With respect to
23
claims rejected on the merits, a petitioner “must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would
24
find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack
25
v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (citing Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 & n.4
26
(1983)). For procedural rulings, a COA will issue only if reasonable jurists could debate
27
(1) whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and (2)
28
whether the court's procedural ruling was correct. Id.
1
Having reviewed its determinations and rulings in denying Petitioner’s motion for
2
reconsideration, the Court finds that none of those rulings meets the Slack standard. The
3
Court therefore declines to issue a COA.
4
5
This Court denies certificate of appealability as to Petitioner’s motion for
reconsideration.
6
7
DATED THIS 10th day of September 2019.
8
9
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?