Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. D'Alessio Contracting, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' 13 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the amount of $11,009.34. The Clerk is further directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 10 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST, et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-01409-MMD-GWF ORDER 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. D’ALESSIO CONTRACTING, INC., a Nevada corporation, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 This action arises out of Defendants’ alleged failure to contribute monthly fringe 18 benefits pursuant to § 502(e)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 19 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1). (Dkt. no. 1.) Before the Court is Plaintiffs The 20 Board Of Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health And Welfare 21 Trust, The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension 22 Trust, the Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust, 23 and The Board of Trustees of Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust’s 24 (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Trust Funds”) Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”) against 25 Defendant D’Alessio Contracting, Inc. (“Defendant”). 26 discussed herein, the Motion is granted. 27 28 1 1 (Dkt. no. 13.) For the reasons Plaintiffs dismissed two individual defendants after they filed bankruptcy. (Dkt. no. 12.) 1 The Complaint alleges that there was a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) 2 between the Laborers International Union of North America, Local 872 and Defendant 3 which incorporates the Trust Agreements creating the Trust Funds. (Dkt. no. 1 at 3.) 4 The CBA required Defendant to contribute monthly fringe benefits to the Trust Funds for 5 each hour worked by or paid to Defendant’s employees who are covered under the CBA 6 and to submit to certain required reports and auditing. (Id. at 4.) Plaintiffs allege that 7 Defendant failed to make the required contributions and complied with the reporting and 8 auditing requirements. (Id. at 4-6.) The Complaint asserts two claims for breach of 9 contract against Defendant. (Id.) 10 The Court finds that default judgment is proper. Plaintiffs have satisfied the 11 procedural requirements for default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). The 12 Clerk properly entered a default against Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) 13 because Defendant has failed to appear after having been properly served. (Dkt. no. 14 11.) Plaintiffs have also satisfied the factors for obtaining default judgment articulated in 15 Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986). Plaintiff is entitled to the unpaid 16 contributions, liquidated damages, interests, fees and costs identified in the Motion, as 17 follows: 22 Unpaid contributions shown in audit results ............................... Liquidated Damages related to audit results .............................. Liquidated Damages owed for March and April, 2014 Reports .. Interest on audit results............................................................... Interest owed for March and April, 2014 Reports ....................... Administrative Fees .................................................................... Attorney's fees ............................................................................ Costs........................................................................................... Total............................................................................................ 23 It is therefore ordered that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment (dkt. no. 13) is 24 granted. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment in favo0rof Plaintiffs and against 25 Defendant in the amount of $11,009.34. The Clerk is further directed to close this case. 18 19 20 21 26 $ 644.40 $ 127.98 $ 1,027.98 $ 119.53 $ 232.16 $ 500.00 $ 7,974.00 $ 384.27 $ 11,009.34 DATED THIS 30th day of December 2015. 27 MIRANDA M. DU 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?