Ledvina v. Eldorado Resorts Corporation et al
Filing
32
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 31 Motion to Extend Time to File Proof of Service. Plaintiff shall have until 6/5/2015 in which to serve Mr. Taleghani. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
7
CHAVERATANA SUSIA LEDVINA,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
Case No. 2:14-cv-01414-RFB-PAL
ORDER
v.
(Mot Ext Time Serve – Dkt. #31)
ELDORADO RESORTS CORPORATION, et
al.,
Defendants.
11
12
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Additional Time to File Proof of Service as to
13
Defendant Dominic Taleghani; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Daniel R.
14
Watkins, Esq. (Dkt. #31).
15
Plaintiff seeks a forty-five day extension to serve Defendant Taleghani. The motion is
16
supported by the affidavit of counsel, and an affidavit of due diligence establishing the efforts
17
made to obtain service, in addition to requests for waiver of service of process. Having read and
18
considered the matter, the court is satisfied that the Plaintiff has established good cause for the
19
forty-five day extension requested. Counsel for the corporate Defendant is also representing the
20
individual Defendants/employees in this case. It appears that Mr. Taleghani is an existing
21
employee of the corporation. Counsel for Plaintiff represents that he has spoken with opposing
22
counsel who agreed to contact Mr. Taleghani to determine if he would authorize counsel to
23
accept service of the amended complaint on his behalf. Counsel for Plaintiff sent defense
24
counsel a written waiver form on March 31, 2015, but at the time this motion was file, had not
25
yet received a response as to whether or not the firm would accept service, or whether Plaintiff
26
would need to continue to incur the expense of tracking and serving Mr. Taleghani.
27
///
28
///
1
1
The court trusts that counsel for the Defendants will communicate to Mr.
2
Taleghani his obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) and the consequence of a failure to waive
3
service outlined in Rule 4(d)(2) which provides:
4
5
If a Defendant located within the United States fails, without good cause, to sign a
return a waiver requested by a Plaintiff located within the United States, the court
must impose on the Defendant:
6
A. The expense later incurred in making service; and
7
B. The reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, of any motion
required to collect those service expenses.
8
For good cause shown,
9
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion (Dkt. #31) is GRANTED and Plaintiff shall
10
have until June 5, 2015, in which to serve Mr. Taleghani.
11
12
DATED this 21st day of April, 2015.
13
14
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?