Villarreal v. Eldorado Resorts Corporation et al

Filing 87

ORDER Granting 85 Stipulation re 80 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 4/29/2016. Replies due by 5/27/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Daniel R. Watkins
Nevada State Bar No. 11881
[e-mail]
Brian S. Letofsky
Nevada State Bar No. 11836
[e-mail]
WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP
400 S. Fourth Street Suite 280
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Office: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, FABIAN VILLARREAL

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

FABIAN VILLARREAL,

12
Plaintiff;
13
14
15
16
17
18

vs.
ELDORADO RESORTS CORPORATION,
a Florida corporation; MICHAEL MARRS;;
KRISTEN BECK; DOMINIC TALAGANI;
AND DOES 1-50, inclusive;

Case No.: 2:14-cv-01415-RFB-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANTS’
REPLY RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(THIRD REQUEST)

Defendants.

19

Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1 and 26-4, at Plaintiff’s request, Plaintiff Fabian Villarreal

20

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation (“Eldorado”), Michael Marrs

21

(“Marrs”), Kristen Beck (“Beck”), and Dominic Taleghani (“Taleghani”) (sometimes hereinafter

22

referred to collectively as “Defendants”) by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby

23

stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’

24

Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants to file Defendants’ Reply thereto. Defendants’

25

Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on 3/16/2016. Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated

26

February 25, 2016, (Doc. #77), the current deadline for filing Plaintiff’s Opposition to

27

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is April 22, 2016; and for filing Defendants’ Reply

28

is May 20, 2016. Good cause exists for the proposed extension of time to file Plaintiff’s
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
-1-

1

Response and Defendants’ Reply related to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.

2

Defendants’ filed Motions for Summary Judgment in three other related matters.

3

indicates that each Motion for Summary Judgment is lengthy, and has extensive exhibits.

4

Reviewing and identifying relevant evidence for each of Defendants’ arguments amidst hundreds

5

of pages of disclosures, deposition transcripts, etc. has proved for Plaintiff to be much more time

6

consuming than anticipated. Based on the foregoing, the parties have agreed that the deadlines

7

above should be extended in the following manner:

8

•

9
10
11

Plaintiff

Plaintiff shall file Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment no later than Friday, April 29, 2016;

•

Defendants shall file Defendants’ Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment no later than Friday, May 27, 2016.

12
13
14

Dated this 22nd day of April, 2016.

Dated this 22nd day of April, 2016.

WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

/s/ Daniel R. Watkins
Daniel R. Watkins
Brian S. Letofsky
400 S. Fourth Street
Suite 280
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Jill Garcia
_
Anthony L. Martin
Jill Garcia
Brian L. Bradford
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

___________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27

May 3, 2016.
Dated:______________________________

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
-2-