Johnson v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 79

ORDER Granting 78 Defendant Foster's Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Nevada Attorney General JARED M. FROST Senior Deputy Attorney General Nevada Bar No. 11132 FRANK A. TODDRE II Nevada Bar No. 11474 Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Bureau of Litigation Public Safety Division 555 E Washington Ave, Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: (702) 486-3177 Email: jfrost@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants Miguel Flores-Nava, Jennifer Nash, and Sheryl Foster 555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068 Office of the Attorney General 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 FRANCIS JOHNSON, 15 Case No. 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Plaintiff, DEFENDANT FOSTER’S MOTION TO EXCUSE HER PARTICIPATION AT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 16 v. 17 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 18 Settlement conference scheduled for October 21, 2016 Defendants. 19 20 21 Defendant Sheryl Foster, by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney 22 General, Jared M. Frost, Senior Deputy Attorney General, and Frank A. Toddre II, Deputy Attorney 23 General, hereby submit this motion to excuse Defendant Foster’s participation at the settlement 24 conference scheduled for October 21, 2016. The motion is made and based on the following 25 points and authorities, the attached declaration, the pleadings and papers on file herein, and any 26 other evidence the Court deems appropriate to consider. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 2 of 4 1 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 2 This is an inmate civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. See ECF 3 No. 19 (Plaintiff’s amended complaint). On December 19, 2014, this Court screened Plaintiff’s 4 Complaint. See ECF No. 18. Pursuant to the Court’s screening order, Plaintiff was permitted to 5 proceed on one count of retaliation against Defendants Flores-Nava, Pharris, Nash, and Foster. 6 Id. at 6. 2016, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 56. On June 15, 2016, the 9 Court scheduled a settlement conference for August 19, 2016. ECF No. 66. On July 14, 2016, 10 555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068 On April 14, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 53. On April 29, 8 Office of the Attorney General 7 the Court rescheduled the settlement pursuant to Defendants’ request for October 21, 2016. 11 ECF No. 71. This timely motion follows. See ECF No. 66 at 2 (“A request for an exception to the 12 above attendance requirements must be filed and served at least one week prior to the 13 settlement conference.”). 14 II. ARGUMENT 15 Defendant Foster respectfully requests that she be excused from participating at the 16 settlement conference set for October 21, 2016. Defendant Foster submits that there is good 17 cause to excuse her based on the following considerations. First, Defendant Foster’s only 18 involvement in this matter relates to her role as a grievance responder. Defendant Foster 19 responded to thousands of individual grievances in her former capacity as Deputy Director for 20 the Nevada Department of Corrections, was not personally involved in the cell search that is the 21 subject of this lawsuit, and has no independent recollection of responding to Plaintiff’s grievance. 22 Exhibit 1 (Declaration of Sheryl Foster). Consequently, it is unlikely that Defendant Foster has 23 information that would assist the Court in facilitating settlement discussions between the parties. 24 Second, Defendant Foster currently resides in Kingman, Arizona, at least five (5) nights a week, 25 and would be required to travel to Las Vegas from Arizona and take leave from her job to attend 26 the conference. Id. Based on the foregoing, Defendant Foster respectfully requests that she be 27 excused from participating at the settlement conference. 28 /// 2 Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 III. CONCLUSION The Court should grant Defendant Foster’s motion to excuse her participation at the upcoming settlement conference. DATED this 30th day of August, 2016. ADAM PAUL LAXALT Nevada Attorney General 5 6 By: 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants 555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068 10 Office of the Attorney General /s/ Jared M. Frost JARED M. FROST Senior Deputy Attorney General Bureau of Litigation Public Safety Division 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of September, 2016. 14 15 16 ___________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I am an employee of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney 3 General, and that on the 30th day of August, 2016, I served the foregoing, DEFENDANT 4 FOSTER’S 5 CONFERENCE, by causing a true and correct copy thereof to be filed with the Clerk of the 6 Court, using the electronic filing system, and by causing a true and correct copy thereof to be 7 delivered to the Department of General Services, for mailing at Las Vegas, Nevada, addressed 8 to the following: 9 555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068 Office of the Attorney General 10 11 MOTION TO EXCUSE HER PARTICIPATION AT THE SETTLEMENT Francis Johnson, #45800 Southern Desert Correctional Center P.O. Box 208 Indian Springs, Nevada 89070 Plaintiff, Pro Se 12 13 14 15 /s/ Carol A. Knight CAROL A. KNIGHT An employee of: STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78-1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 1 Declaration of Sheryl Foster EXHIBIT 1 Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78-1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?