Johnson v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
79
ORDER Granting 78 Defendant Foster's Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Nevada Attorney General
JARED M. FROST
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Nevada Bar No. 11132
FRANK A. TODDRE II
Nevada Bar No. 11474
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Bureau of Litigation
Public Safety Division
555 E Washington Ave, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Phone: (702) 486-3177
Email: jfrost@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Defendants Miguel Flores-Nava,
Jennifer Nash, and Sheryl Foster
555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068
Office of the Attorney General
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
FRANCIS JOHNSON,
15
Case No. 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL
Plaintiff,
DEFENDANT FOSTER’S MOTION TO
EXCUSE HER PARTICIPATION AT THE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
16
v.
17
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
18
Settlement conference scheduled for
October 21, 2016
Defendants.
19
20
21
Defendant Sheryl Foster, by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney
22
General, Jared M. Frost, Senior Deputy Attorney General, and Frank A. Toddre II, Deputy Attorney
23
General, hereby submit this motion to excuse Defendant Foster’s participation at the settlement
24
conference scheduled for October 21, 2016. The motion is made and based on the following
25
points and authorities, the attached declaration, the pleadings and papers on file herein, and any
26
other evidence the Court deems appropriate to consider.
27
///
28
///
1
Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 2 of 4
1
I.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
2
This is an inmate civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. See ECF
3
No. 19 (Plaintiff’s amended complaint). On December 19, 2014, this Court screened Plaintiff’s
4
Complaint. See ECF No. 18. Pursuant to the Court’s screening order, Plaintiff was permitted to
5
proceed on one count of retaliation against Defendants Flores-Nava, Pharris, Nash, and Foster.
6
Id. at 6.
2016, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 56. On June 15, 2016, the
9
Court scheduled a settlement conference for August 19, 2016. ECF No. 66. On July 14, 2016,
10
555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068
On April 14, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 53. On April 29,
8
Office of the Attorney General
7
the Court rescheduled the settlement pursuant to Defendants’ request for October 21, 2016.
11
ECF No. 71. This timely motion follows. See ECF No. 66 at 2 (“A request for an exception to the
12
above attendance requirements must be filed and served at least one week prior to the
13
settlement conference.”).
14
II.
ARGUMENT
15
Defendant Foster respectfully requests that she be excused from participating at the
16
settlement conference set for October 21, 2016. Defendant Foster submits that there is good
17
cause to excuse her based on the following considerations. First, Defendant Foster’s only
18
involvement in this matter relates to her role as a grievance responder. Defendant Foster
19
responded to thousands of individual grievances in her former capacity as Deputy Director for
20
the Nevada Department of Corrections, was not personally involved in the cell search that is the
21
subject of this lawsuit, and has no independent recollection of responding to Plaintiff’s grievance.
22
Exhibit 1 (Declaration of Sheryl Foster). Consequently, it is unlikely that Defendant Foster has
23
information that would assist the Court in facilitating settlement discussions between the parties.
24
Second, Defendant Foster currently resides in Kingman, Arizona, at least five (5) nights a week,
25
and would be required to travel to Las Vegas from Arizona and take leave from her job to attend
26
the conference. Id. Based on the foregoing, Defendant Foster respectfully requests that she be
27
excused from participating at the settlement conference.
28
///
2
Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
III.
CONCLUSION
The Court should grant Defendant Foster’s motion to excuse her participation at the
upcoming settlement conference.
DATED this 30th day of August, 2016.
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Nevada Attorney General
5
6
By:
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants
555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068
10
Office of the Attorney General
/s/ Jared M. Frost
JARED M. FROST
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Bureau of Litigation
Public Safety Division
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day
of September, 2016.
14
15
16
___________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78 Filed 08/30/16 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that I am an employee of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney
3
General, and that on the 30th day of August, 2016, I served the foregoing, DEFENDANT
4
FOSTER’S
5
CONFERENCE, by causing a true and correct copy thereof to be filed with the Clerk of the
6
Court, using the electronic filing system, and by causing a true and correct copy thereof to be
7
delivered to the Department of General Services, for mailing at Las Vegas, Nevada, addressed
8
to the following:
9
555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-1068
Office of the Attorney General
10
11
MOTION
TO
EXCUSE
HER
PARTICIPATION
AT
THE
SETTLEMENT
Francis Johnson, #45800
Southern Desert Correctional Center
P.O. Box 208
Indian Springs, Nevada 89070
Plaintiff, Pro Se
12
13
14
15
/s/ Carol A. Knight
CAROL A. KNIGHT
An employee of:
STATE OF NEVADA
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78-1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 1
Declaration of
Sheryl Foster
EXHIBIT 1
Case 2:14-cv-01425-GMN-PAL Document 78-1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?