Pengilly et al v. Nevada Association Services, Inc. et al

Filing 41

ORDER that Plaintiff James W. Pengilly shall deposit a bond payment in the amount of $10,800.00 in support of the Preliminary Injunction in this matter to the Clerk of this Court by July 22, 2015. FURTHER ORDERED that by the 22nd day of every m onth thereafter for as long as the Preliminary Injunction shall remain in effect, Plaintiff shall deposit monthly bond payments in the amount of $1,200.00 to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/16/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 JAMES W. PENGILLY, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 11 Case No. 2:14-cv-01463-RFB-NJK ORDER v. NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. 12 13 For the reasons given at the hearing on June 22, 2015, ECF No. 17, 14 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff James W. Pengilly shall deposit 1 a bond payment in the 15 amount of $10,800.00 in support of the Preliminary Injunction in this matter to the Clerk of this 16 Court by July 22, 2015. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by the 22nd day of every month thereafter for as long as 18 the Preliminary Injunction shall remain in effect, Plaintiff shall deposit monthly bond payments in 19 the amount of $1,200.00 to the Clerk. The bond payments will be held in the Clerk's Registry 20 Account until further Order of this Court. 21 The Clerk shall hold the money until the end of the case at which point the Court will issue 22 an order regarding the disbursement of the funds. 23 DATED: July 16, 2015. 24 25 RICHARD F. BOULWARE II UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 26 27 1 28 Pursuant to D. Nev. R. 65.1-4, the Clerk is not permitted to accept personal checks or checks from an attorneys. A Certificate of Cash Deposit form is available on the Court’s website at http://www.nvd.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?