Walker et al v. North Las Vegas Police Department et al

Filing 153

ORDER Denying without prejudice 150 Amended Motion for Order Fixing Expert Witness Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 THOMAS WALKER, et al., 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01475-JAD-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 150) 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for an order fixing expert witness fees. 17 Docket No. 150. The Court denied Plaintiffs’ initial motion because it failed to show that “[a] prefiling 18 conference between counsel that includes personal consultation” had been conducted. Docket No. 146 19 (citing Local Rule 26-7(c) and Local Rule IA 1-3(f)). Plaintiffs’ renewed motion indicates that their 20 counsel sent a letter to opposing counsel and that a responsive letter has been received. Docket No. 150- 21 1 at ¶¶ 10, 14. As the previously cited rules make clear, the exchange of these letters is not sufficient 22 to satisfy the pre-filing conference requirement because it lacks “personal consultation”: 23 Unless these rules or a court order provides otherwise, this requirement [to meet and 24 confer] may only be satisfied through direct dialogue and discussion in a face-to-face 25 meeting, telephone conference, or video exchange. 26 electronic, or voice-mail communications does not satisfy this requirement. 27 28 Local Rule IA 1-3(f) (emphasis added). The exchange of written, 1 2 Because the renewed motion for an order fixing expert witness fees continues to fail to establish that a sufficient pre-filing conference was conducted, it is DENIED without prejudice. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: August 14, 2017 5 6 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?