Konami Gaming Inc. v. PTT, LLC

Filing 89

ORDER. The Court ORDERS that the following documents be STRICKEN from the record and RESTRICTED from public view: 62 , 77 -1, 77 -2, 80 -1, and 80 -2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant re-file 62 the declaration of Christopher B. Had ley in support of 60 its motion to limit the number of asserted patent claims with all appropriate exhibits, no later than 10/19/16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court VACATES its prior order 68 granting Defendant's motion for leave to file documents under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DENIES 71 Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

KONAMI GAMING, INC.,

7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
HIGH 5 GAMES, LLC,
10
11

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-01483-RFB-NJK
ORDER

12
13

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to withdraw certain exhibits from the

14

record. Docket No. 87. On August 2, 2016, the Court granted Defendant’s motion for leave to

15

file under seal. See Docket Nos. 64, 68. On August 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for

16

reconsideration. Docket No. 71. Plaintiff contended that Defendant’s redactions did not meet

17

the relevant sealing standards and that the order prejudiced Plaintiff. See id. at 7-20. Defendant

18

responded to Plaintiff’s motion on August 29, 2016. Docket No. 74. Because Defendant was

19

willing to revise its redactions, the Court ordered Defendant to file a renewed motion for leave to

20

file under seal. Docket No. 76. Defendant then filed a renewed motion, Docket No. 77, which

21

the Court denied for failure to include a memorandum of points and authorities. Docket No. 78.

22

The Court ordered Defendant to file a renewed motion for leave to file under seal. Id.

23

Defendant then filed a renewed motion that the Court denied for failure to properly address the

24

sealing standards. Docket Nos. 79, 85.

25

Originally at issue were Exhibits E and G to a declaration by Christopher B. Hadley

26

(Docket No. 62) that Defendant had filed in support of a motion to limit the number of patent

27

claims asserted by Plaintiff (Docket No. 60). See, e.g., Docket No. 71. Defendant now moves to

28

withdraw all versions of these exhibits from the docket. See Docket No. 87.

1
2

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the following documents be STRICKEN from the
record and RESTRICTED from public view:

3

1.

Docket No. 62;

4

2.

Docket No. 77-1;

5

3.

Docket No. 77-2;

6

4.

Docket No. 80-1; and

7

5.

Docket No. 80-2

8

The Court ORDERS Defendant to re-file the declaration of Christopher B. Hadley

9
10
11

(Docket No. 62) in support of its motion to limit the number of asserted patent claims (Docket
No. 60) with all appropriate exhibits, no later than October 19, 2016.
The Court additionally VACATES its prior order granting Defendant’s motion for leave

12

to file documents under seal, Docket No. 68. The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for

13

reconsideration, Docket No. 71, as moot.

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated: October 13, 2016

16
17

NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2