Konami Gaming, Inc. v. Marks Studios, LLC

Filing 106

ORDER Granting 105 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 105 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

12

Jonathan Moskin
Ramy Hanna
Adam Pence
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
90 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10016-1314
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
(admitted pro hac vice)

13

Attorneys for Defendant Marks Studios, LLC

7
8
9

SANTORO WHITMIRE

10
10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
[phone] – fax [phone]

NICHOLAS J. SANTORO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 0532
[e-mail]
JASON D. SMITH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9691
[e-mail]
SANTORO WHITMIRE
10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
702/948-8773

11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

16
17

KONAMI GAMING, INC., a Nevada
corporation,

18
19

Plaintiff,
v.

20
21
22

MARKS STUDIOS, LLC d/b/a Gimmie
Games, a Georgia limited liability company,

CASE NO.:

2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH

Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey
Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING
ORDER
(FIFTH REQUEST)

Defendant.

23
24

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4. Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. (“Konami” or

25

“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games (“Marks Studios” or

26

Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows:

27
28

WHEREAS, the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and
Scheduling Order (the “Scheduling Order”) on December 30, 2014, (Docket no. 24);

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 105 Filed 10/16/15 Page 2 of 3

WHEREAS, the Court so ordered the Scheduling Order on January 27, 2015 (Docket no.

1
2

31);

3

WHEREAS, to date, the Plaintiff and Defendant have made their Initial Disclosures

4

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) and have filed the Stipulated Protective

5

Order required under Local Rule 16.1-4;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, discovery is partially stayed until the

6
7

Court issues a Markman order on claim construction.
WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties most recent proposed modification of the

8

SANTORO WHITMIRE

10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
[phone] – fax [phone]

9

Scheduling Order on October 1, 2015 (Docket No. 95);

10

WHEREAS, lead counsel for the defendant in this action, Mr. Moskin, is also expressly

11

required as lead counsel for Kayak Software Corporation to attend a settlement conference in the

12

matter Evox Productions LLC v. Kayak Software Corporation, Case No. 2:15-cv-05053-SS (C.D.

13

Cal.), on the proposed date of exchange of opening claim construction briefs, October 21, 2015,

14

which will also require a day of travel from New York to Los Angeles on October 20, 2015;

15

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend by one week all of the current deadlines in

16

the current schedule to allow the parties sufficient time to exchange Claim Construction Briefs

17

and Expert Disclosures and Reports.

18

WHEREAS, this is the parties’ fifth request to modify the Scheduling Order;

19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

20

counsel for the named parties hereto, that the schedule in the Scheduling Order will be amended

21

as follows:

22
23
24
25
26

Event

Basis

Proposed Date

Opening Claim Construction Briefs Exchange

LR 16.1-16

October 28, 2015

Responsive Claim Construction Brief Exchange

LR 16.1-16

November 17, 2015

Markman Hearing

N/A
N/A

To be Set By Court

27

Initial Expert Disclosures and Submission of
Interim Status Report

28

Rebuttal Expert Exchange

N/A

-2-

November 30, 2015
December 29, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 105 Filed 10/16/15 Page 3 of 3

1

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that nothing herein alters the

2

obligations and requirements included in the Scheduling Order and that this Stipulation is made

3

in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

4

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD,

5

Dated: October 16, 2015

Dated: October 16, 2015

6

By: /s/ Nicholas J. Santoro
Nicholas J. Santoro
(Nevada Bar No. 532)
Jason D. Smith
(Nevada Bar No. 9691)
SANTORO WHITMIRE
10100 West Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

By: /s/ Patrick McCarthy
Patrick M. McCarthy
(Michigan Bar No. P49100)
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS
One North Main Building
101 North Main Street
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1475
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
(admitted pro hac vice)
Attorney for Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc.

7
8

SANTORO WHITMIRE

10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
[phone] – fax [phone]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Jonathan Moskin
Ramy Hanna
Adam Pence
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
90 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10016-1314
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
(admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant Marks Studios, LLC

21
ORDER

22
23
24
25
26

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: October 19, 2015
_______
__________________________________________
Carl W. Hoffman
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28
-3-