Konami Gaming, Inc. v. Marks Studios, LLC

Filing 45

ORDER Granting 44 Stipulation Regarding Discovery, Including Discovery of Electronically Stored Information ("ESI"). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/18/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 10

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Nicholas J. Santoro, Esq.
(Nevada Bar No. 532)
Jason D. Smith, Esq.
(Nevada Bar No. 9691)
SANTORO WHITMIRE
10100 West Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Jonathan E. Moskin, Esq.
Akiva Cohen, Esq.
Ramy Hanna, Esq.
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
90 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10016-1314
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant/CounterclaimPlaintiff, Marks Studios, LLC

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

14
15

KONAMI GAMING, Inc., a Nevada
corporation,

16

Plaintiff,

17
18
19

v.
MARKS STUDIOS, LLC d/b/a Gimmie
Games, a Georgia limited liability company,

20

Defendant.

21
22

MARKS STUDIOS, LLC d/b/a Gimmie
Games, a Georgia limited liability company,

23

Counterclaim-Plaintiff,

24

v.

25
26

E-FILED ON 3/17/2015

KONAMI GAMING, Inc., a Nevada
corporation,

27
28
4840-2311-0689.1

Counterclaim-Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY,
INCLUDING DISCOVERY OF
ELECTRONICALLY STORED
INFORMATION (“ESI”)

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 10

WHEREAS, the parties have discussed and agreed on the following procedures to

1
2

govern Discovery;
NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE COURT’S APPROVAL, IT IS

3
4
5
6

HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties, through their undersigned
counsel, that:
I.

7

General Provisions
A.

8
9
10

Cooperation.
Parties are expected to reach agreements cooperatively on how to conduct

discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26–36. In the event that the parties are unable to agree on the
parameters and/or timing of discovery, the following default standards shall apply until further

11
order of the Court or the parties reach agreement.
12
B.

13

Proportionality.
Parties are expected to use reasonable, good faith and proportional efforts to

14
15

preserve, identify and produce relevant information.1 This includes identifying appropriate

16

limits to discovery, including limits on custodians, identification of relevant subject matter, time

17

periods for discovery and other parameters to limit and guide preservation and discovery issues.

18

C.

19

Preservation of Discoverable Information.
A party has a common law obligation to take reasonable and proportional steps to

20
21

preserve discoverable information in the party’s possession, custody or control.
Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the parties shall not be

22
23

required to modify, on a going-forward basis, the procedures used by them in the ordinary course

24

of business to back up and archive data; provided, however, that the parties shall preserve the

25

non-duplicative discoverable information currently in their possession, custody or control.

26

D.

Privilege.

27
28
1

Information can originate in any form, including ESI and paper, and is not limited to information created or stored
electronically.
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 3 of 10

(i)

1

The parties are to confer on the nature and scope of privilege logs for the

2

case, including whether categories of information can be excluded from any logging

3

requirements and whether alternatives to document-by-document logs can be exchanged.

4
5

(ii)

With respect to information generated after the filing of the complaint,

parties are not required to include any such information in privilege logs.

6

(iii)

Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information

7
8

are protected from disclosure and discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and (B).
(iv)

9

In accordance Fed. R. Evid. 502, the parties agree that information that

10

contains privileged matter or attorney work-product shall be immediately returned if such

11

information appears on its face to have been inadvertently produced or if notice is provided

12

within a reasonable time after inadvertent production. To the extent that the receiving party does

13

not believe the production was inadvertent, it may keep a single copy of the allegedly

14
inadvertently produced material for use solely in connection with a motion challenging the claim
15
16

of inadvertence, which must be filed within one week of receiving a request for the return of the

17

challenged material. In determining such motion, any delay from the time of production to the

18

producing party’s identification of the challenged material as privileged shall not be considered,

19

but the Court may consider as relevant any delay from the time that the document was identified

20

as specifically relevant or potentially privileged by the receiving party, whether by use in an

21

interrogatory response, deposition, or otherwise, to the time that the producing party identifying

22
the document as privileged and inadvertently produced. Pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal
23
24

Rules of Evidence, the Court orders that no waiver of privilege shall be found in this or any other

25

action or proceeding on the basis of any such production in this action found by the Court or

26

acknowledged by the parties to be inadvertent.

27

II.

Initial Disclosures.

28
3
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 4 of 10

Within seven days of the lifting of the stay on general discovery provided in the

1
2

Initial Scheduling Order, each party shall disclose:
A.

3
4
5
6

Custodians.
The 5 custodians most likely to have discoverable information in their possession,

custody or control, from the most likely to the least likely shall be identified by name, title, role
in the instant dispute, and the subject matter of the information, to the extent that the party has 5

7
such custodians. In the event that a party has fewer than 5 custodians, the party will identify
8
9

those custodians.
B.

10

Non-custodial data sources.2
A list of the non-custodial data sources that are most likely to contain non-

11
12

duplicative discoverable information for preservation and production consideration, from the

13

most likely to the least likely.

14

C.

15

Notice.
The parties shall identify any issues relating to:

16
(i)

Any ESI (by type, date, custodian, electronic system or other criteria) that

17
18

a party asserts is not reasonably accessible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i).
(ii)

19
20

the timing and sequencing of such discovery.

21
22
23

Third-party discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 and otherwise, including

(iii)

Production of information subject to privacy protections, including

information that may need to be produced from outside of the United States and subject to
foreign laws.

24
Lack of proper notice of such issues may result in a party losing the ability to
25
26

pursue or to protect such information.

27
2

28

That is, a system, repository or container that stores ESI, but over which an individual custodian does not organize,
manage or maintain the ESI in the system, repository or container (e.g., enterprise system or database).

4
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 5 of 10

1
2

III.

Specific E-Discovery Issues.
a.

3

On-site inspection of electronic media. Such an inspection shall not be permitted

4

absent a demonstration by the requesting party of specific need and good cause. The parties

5

agree inspections, either on-site or off-site, will be reasonably provided for the relevant games or

6

copies of the relevant games will be provided in lieu of any inspection.

7

b.

Search methodology. If the producing party elects to use search terms to locate

8
9
10

potentially responsive ESI, then in advance of its search, it shall disclose the search terms to the
requesting party. Absent a showing of good cause, a requesting party may request no more than

11

10 additional terms to be used in connection with the electronic search. Appropriately focused

12

terms, rather than over-broad terms (e.g., product and company names), shall be employed. The

13

producing party shall search (i) the non-custodial data sources identified in accordance with

14

paragraph III(b); and (ii) emails and other ESI maintained by the custodians identified in

15
accordance with paragraph III(a). The parties agree that archives and back-up media do not have
16
17

to be searched unless the requesting party demonstrates good cause for such a request.
c.

18

Format. Except as otherwise provided for in this Stipulation ESI and non- ESI

19

shall be produced to the requesting party as text searchable image files (e.g., PDF or TIFF) at a

20

resolution of at least 300 dpi. When a text-searchable image file is produced, the producing

21

party must preserve the integrity of the underlying ESI – i.e., the original formatting, the

22

metadata (as noted below) and, where applicable, the revision history. The parties shall produce

23
their information in the following format: full text searchable PDF or single page TIFF images
24
25

and associated multi-page text files containing extracted text or OCR with Concordance (dat)

26

and Opticon (opt) load files containing all requisite information including relevant metadata.

27

The parties shall produce email attachments sequentially after the parent email. For documents

28
5
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 6 of 10

1

which already exist in PDF format prior to production (i.e., which the producing party receives

2

from a client or third party in PDF format), the producing party may provide them in that same

3

PDF format, whether searchable or non-searchable. For documents converted to PDF format

4

prior to production, the producing party shall make reasonable efforts to convert to searchable

5

PDF.

6

d.

Native files. The only files that should be produced in native format are files not

7
8
9
10

easily converted to image format, such as Excel and Access files. This Stipulation does not
govern access to source code, which shall be made accessible pursuant to a Protective Order
entered in this case.

11
12
13

e.

Requests for hi-resolution or color documents. The parties agree to respond to

reasonable and specific requests for the production of higher resolution or color images. Nothing
in this Stipulation shall preclude a producing party from objecting to such requests as

14
unreasonable in number, timing or scope, provided that a producing party shall not object if the
15
16

document as originally produced is illegible or difficult to read. The producing party shall have

17

the option of responding by producing a native-file version of the document. If a dispute arises

18

with regard to requests for higher resolution or color images, the parties will meet and confer in

19

good faith to try to resolve it.

20
21

f.

Load File fields. The parties are only obligated to provide the following metadata

for all ESI produced to the extent such metadata exists. The parties are not obligated to include

22
metadata for any document that does not contain such metadata in the original, if it is not
23
24

possible to automate the creation of metadata when the document is collected, or if the document

25

was previously collected and the metadata is absent in the previous collection. Metadata fields

26

which should be produced, if available: Volume, DOC ID, Custodian, File Path, Email Subject,

27

Conversation Index, From, To, CC, BCC, Date Sent, Time Sent, Date Received, Time Received,

28
6
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 7 of 10

1

Filename, Author, Date Created, Date Modified, MD5 Hash, File Size, File Extension, Control

2

Number Begin, Control Number End Attachment Range, Attachment Begin, and Attachment

3

End (or the equivalent thereof). In the event a producing party produces documents from a

4

previous collection in which any of the metadata specified herein was not also collected, the

5
6

producing party shall respond to requests, on a document-by-document basis, for additional
metadata, to the extent such additional metadata is reasonably available. Nothing in this

7
8
9

Stipulation shall preclude a producing party from objecting to such requests as unreasonable in
number, timing or scope.
g.

10

Databases. Certain types of databases are dynamic in nature and will often

11

contain information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of

12

admissible evidence. Thus, a party may opt to produce relevant and responsive information from

13

databases in an alternate form, such as a report or data table. These reports or data tables will be

14
produced in a static format. The parties agree to identify the specific databases, by name, that
15
16

contain the relevant and responsive information that parties produce. The parties agree to

17

respond to reasonable and specific requests for the production of additional information

18

regarding the database such as relevant underlying formulae. If a dispute arises with regard to

19

requests for additional database information, the parties will meet and confer in good faith to try

20

to resolve it.

21

h.

Production media and encryption of productions. Unless otherwise agreed, the

22
parties shall provide document productions in the following manner: The producing party shall
23
24

provide the production data on CDs, DVDs, external hard drives, or electronically via File

25

Transfer Protocol (FTP) as appropriate. The producing party may encrypt the production data

26

using a suitable encryption program, such as TrueCrypt, and if it does, the producing party shall

27
28
7
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 8 of 10

1
2

forward the password to decrypt the production data separately from the CD, DVD, external
drive, or FTP site on which the production data is saved.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 9 of 10

1

Dated: March 17, 2015

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

By: /s/ Nicholas J. Santoro
Nicholas J. Santoro, Esq.
(Nevada Bar No. 532)
SANTORO WHITMIRE
10100 West Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Jonathan E. Moskin, Esq.
Akiva Cohen, Esq.
Ramy Hanna, Esq.
Adam Pence, Esq.
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
90 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10016-1314
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
(admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant Marks Studios, LLC

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
4840-2311-0689.1

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 03/17/15 Page 10 of 10

1

Dated: March 17, 2015

2
3
4
5
6

By: /s/ Kimberly P. Stein
Kimberly P. Stein, Esq.
(Nevada Bar No. 8675)
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS
Wells Fargo Tower, Suite 1000
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

7

and

8

Patrick M. McCarthy, Esq.
(Michigan Bar No. P49100)
(admitted pro hac vice)
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS
One North Main Building
101 North Main Street
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1475
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Ltd.
15
16
17

ORDER

18
19

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

20
21
22

Dated: March 18, 2015
_______

23
24
25
__________________________________________
26
27
28

Carl W. Hoffman
United States Magistrate Judge
10

4840-2311-0689.1