Konami Gaming, Inc. v. Marks Studios, LLC

Filing 95

ORDER Granting 93 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 93 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

12

Jonathan Moskin
Ramy Hanna
Adam Pence
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
90 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10016-1314
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
(admitted pro hac vice)

13

Attorneys for Defendant Marks Studios, LLC

7
8
9

SANTORO WHITMIRE

10
10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
[phone] – fax [phone]

NICHOLAS J. SANTORO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 0532
[e-mail]
JASON D. SMITH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9691
[e-mail]
SANTORO WHITMIRE
10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
702/948-8773

11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

16
17

KONAMI GAMING, INC., a Nevada
corporation,

18
19

Plaintiff,
v.

20
21
22

MARKS STUDIOS, LLC d/b/a Gimmie
Games, a Georgia limited liability company,

CASE NO.:

2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH

Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey
Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING
ORDER
(FOURTH REQUEST)

Defendant.

23
24

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4. Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. (“Konami” or

25

“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games (“Marks Studios” or

26

“Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows:

27
28

WHEREAS, the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and
Scheduling Order (the “Scheduling Order”) on December 30, 2014, (Docket no. 24);

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 93 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 3

WHEREAS, the Court so ordered the Scheduling Order on January 27, 2015 (Docket no.

1
2

31);
WHEREAS, the parties’ first request to modify the Scheduling Order was on February 6,

3
4

2015 (Docket No. 35);
WHEREAS, the Court approved the proposed modification of the Scheduling Order on

5
6

February 9, 2015 (Docket No. 37);
WHEREAS, the parties’ second request to modify the Scheduling Order was on May 18,

7
8

2015 (Docket No. 65);
WHEREAS, the Court approved the proposed modification of the Scheduling Order on

SANTORO WHITMIRE

10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
[phone] – fax [phone]

9
10

May 19, 2015 (Docket No. 66);
WHEREAS, the parties’ third request to modify the Scheduling Order was on July 23,

11
12

2015 (Docket No. 73);
WHEREAS, the Court approved the proposed modification of the Scheduling Order on

13
14

July 29, 2015 (Docket No. 75);
WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy, the parties have agreed to stipulate to

15
16

simultaneous exchange of opening and responsive claim construction briefs.
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to stipulate to a modification of the case schedule,

17
18

to allow the parties sufficient time to resolve their disputes;

19

WHEREAS, this is the parties’ second request to modify the Scheduling Order;

20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

21

counsel for the named parties hereto, that the schedule in the Scheduling Order will be amended

22

as follows:

23
24
25
26
27
28

Event

Basis

Proposed Date

Simultaneous Opening Claim Construction Briefs
Exchange (75 pages)

LR 16.1-16

October 21, 2015

Simultaneous Responsive Claim Construction Brief
Exchange (50 pages)

LR 16.1-16

November 6, 2015

Markman Hearing

N/A

To be Set By Court

-2-

Case 2:14-cv-01485-JAD-CWH Document 93 Filed 09/30/15 Page 3 of 3

1

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that nothing herein affects either

2

party’s ability to seek to further modify the case schedule or alters the obligations and

3

requirements included in the Scheduling Order and that this Stipulation is made in good faith and

4

not for the purpose of delay.

5
6
7
8

SANTORO WHITMIRE

10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
[phone] – fax [phone]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD,
Dated: September 30, 2015

Dated: September 30, 2015

By: /s/ Nicholas J. Santoro
Nicholas J. Santoro
(Nevada Bar No. 532)
Jason D. Smith
(Nevada Bar No. 9691)
SANTORO WHITMIRE
10100 West Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

By: /s/ Patrick M. McCarthy
Patrick M. McCarthy
(Michigan Bar No. P49100)
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS
One North Main Building
101 North Main Street
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1475
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
(admitted pro hac vice)
Attorney for Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc.

Jonathan Moskin
Ramy Hanna
Adam Pence
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
90 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10016-1314
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
(admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant Marks Studios, LLC

22
23

ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

24
25

Dated: _______ 1, 2015
October

26
27
28

__________________________________________
Carl W. Hoffman
United States Magistrate Judge
-3-