Bridge v. Credit One Financial
Filing
165
ORDER Granting 164 Stipulation re 154 REDACTED MOTION to Certify Class, Appointment as Class Representative, and Appointment of Class Counsel. Responses due by 3/31/2016. Replies due by 4/25/2016. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/14/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK Document 164 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Patrick J. Reilly (NBN 6103)
Brian G. Anderson (NBN 10500)
R. Calder Huntington (NBN 11996)
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Phone: (702) 222-2542
Fax: (702) 669-4650
preilly@hollandhart.com
bganderson@hollandhart.com
rchuntington@hollandhart.com
Attorneys for Defendant Credit One
Bank, N.A.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
10 WILLIAM BRIDGE, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
11
Plaintiff,
12 v.
CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION, APPOINTMENT AS
CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, AND
APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 23
13 CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.
14
Defendant.
15
(SECOND REQUEST)
16
17
Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”) and Plaintiff William Bridge
18
(“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of
19
Civil Procedure 6(b)(1), and Local Rule 6-1, hereby stipulate to extend the briefing schedule
20
related to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, Appointment as Class Representative, and
21
Appointment of Class Counsel pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (“Motion”) (Dkt. # 154), filed
22
February 2, 2016, and state as follows:
23
response to the Motion is scheduled for March 21, 2016. (Dkt. # 161.)
24
25
26
Plaintiff filed his Motion on February 2, 2016 and Credit One’s current deadline to file a
Due to Credit One’s ongoing efforts to investigate and respond to the contentions
presented in the Motion, and certain conflicts with the schedules of counsel, the parties
27
28
1
8556650_1
Case 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK Document 164 Filed 03/10/16 Page 2 of 2
1
have agreed to extend Credit One’s deadline to file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion from
2
March 21, 2016 to March 31, 2016.
3
The parties further agree that the deadline for Plaintiff’s reply brief in further support of
4
his Motion shall remain due on April 25, 2016; however, Credit One agrees it will not
5
oppose a request by Plaintiff to extend his reply brief deadline by no more than 21 days.
6
This Stipulation is submitted prior to the expiration of the period provided for the filing
7
of Credit One’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion, is not interposed merely for delay, and is
8
made in good faith between the parties hereto.
9
WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that the deadline for Credit One to file its
10
Response to Plaintiff’s Motion shall be March 31, 2016; and the deadline for Plaintiff to file a
11
Reply in support of his Motion shall be April 25, 2016.
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
12
13
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
/s/ Brian G. Anderson
Patrick J. Reilly (NBN 6103)
Brian G. Anderson (NBN 10500)
R. Calder Huntington (NBN 11996)
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Attorneys for Defendant
/s/ Kyle J. McGee
Adam J. Levitt (admitted pro hac vice)
Kyle J. McGee (admitted pro hac vice)
GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1200
Chicago, IL 60602
Attorneys for Plaintiff
/s/ Leonard H. Stone
Leonard H. Stone (NBN 5791)
Michael P. O’Rourke (NBN 6764)
SHOOK & STONE, CHTD.
7109 S. Fourth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiff
18
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
25
SR.UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LLOYD D. GEORGE
DATED:
March 2016
26
27
28
2
8556650_1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?