Bridge v. Credit One Financial

Filing 165

ORDER Granting 164 Stipulation re 154 REDACTED MOTION to Certify Class, Appointment as Class Representative, and Appointment of Class Counsel. Responses due by 3/31/2016. Replies due by 4/25/2016. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/14/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK Document 164 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Patrick J. Reilly (NBN 6103) Brian G. Anderson (NBN 10500) R. Calder Huntington (NBN 11996) HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 Phone: (702) 222-2542 Fax: (702) 669-4650 preilly@hollandhart.com bganderson@hollandhart.com rchuntington@hollandhart.com Attorneys for Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 10 WILLIAM BRIDGE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, APPOINTMENT AS CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 23 13 CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A. 14 Defendant. 15 (SECOND REQUEST) 16 17 Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”) and Plaintiff William Bridge 18 (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of 19 Civil Procedure 6(b)(1), and Local Rule 6-1, hereby stipulate to extend the briefing schedule 20 related to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, Appointment as Class Representative, and 21 Appointment of Class Counsel pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (“Motion”) (Dkt. # 154), filed 22 February 2, 2016, and state as follows: 23  response to the Motion is scheduled for March 21, 2016. (Dkt. # 161.) 24 25 26 Plaintiff filed his Motion on February 2, 2016 and Credit One’s current deadline to file a  Due to Credit One’s ongoing efforts to investigate and respond to the contentions presented in the Motion, and certain conflicts with the schedules of counsel, the parties 27 28 1 8556650_1 Case 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK Document 164 Filed 03/10/16 Page 2 of 2 1 have agreed to extend Credit One’s deadline to file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion from 2 March 21, 2016 to March 31, 2016. 3  The parties further agree that the deadline for Plaintiff’s reply brief in further support of 4 his Motion shall remain due on April 25, 2016; however, Credit One agrees it will not 5 oppose a request by Plaintiff to extend his reply brief deadline by no more than 21 days. 6  This Stipulation is submitted prior to the expiration of the period provided for the filing 7 of Credit One’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion, is not interposed merely for delay, and is 8 made in good faith between the parties hereto. 9 WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that the deadline for Credit One to file its 10 Response to Plaintiff’s Motion shall be March 31, 2016; and the deadline for Plaintiff to file a 11 Reply in support of his Motion shall be April 25, 2016. HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 12 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED: /s/ Brian G. Anderson Patrick J. Reilly (NBN 6103) Brian G. Anderson (NBN 10500) R. Calder Huntington (NBN 11996) HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 Attorneys for Defendant /s/ Kyle J. McGee Adam J. Levitt (admitted pro hac vice) Kyle J. McGee (admitted pro hac vice) GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, IL 60602 Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Leonard H. Stone Leonard H. Stone (NBN 5791) Michael P. O’Rourke (NBN 6764) SHOOK & STONE, CHTD. 7109 S. Fourth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 25 SR.UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LLOYD D. GEORGE DATED: March 2016 26 27 28 2 8556650_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?