Bridge v. Credit One Financial

Filing 19

ORDER that a Hearing is set for 12/19/2014 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe re 18 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel must file a certification with the Court no later than 12:00 p.m. on December 19, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-1 and 26-4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 WILLIAM BRIDGE, 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 15 Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling order filed 16 on December 16, 2014. Docket No. 18. Previously, Plaintiff filed his own proposed discovery plan 17 and scheduling order, which was denied without prejudice. Docket Nos. 16, 17. On December 9, 18 2014, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer and submit a stipulated discovery plan that 19 complies with the Local Rules. Docket No. 17. The parties’ current plan fails to comply with Local 20 Rule 26-1(d), in that the parties have failed to stipulate to the dates. Docket No. 18. Additionally, 21 the Court specifically stated in its prior order that Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan misstated Local 22 Rule 26-4.1 Docket No. 17, at 1-2. Nonetheless, the parties subsequently submitted the pending 23 proposed discovery plan and scheduling order which, again, misstates Local Rule 26-4. Docket No. 24 18, at 3, 6-7. 25 ... 10 Plaintiff(s), 11 vs. 12 CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL, 13 Defendant(s). Case No. 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK ORDER SETTING HEARING (Docket No. 18) 26 27 28 1 “Third, Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan misstates Local Rule 26-4, in that it provides that requests to extend deadlines in the scheduling order need only be filed 20 days before the discovery cut-off. See Docket No. 16 at 5. Local Rule 26-4 requires that any request to extend deadlines set forth in the scheduling order must be submitted at least 21 days before the subject deadline.” Docket No. 17, at 1-2. 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED: 3 1. The Court hereby SETS a hearing on the parties’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling 4 order (Docket No. 18) for December 19, 2014, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3B. 5 2. Alternatively, the filing of a stipulated proposed discovery plan, that complies with the 6 Local Rules, by that date will suffice to vacate this hearing. 7 3. In an effort to ensure future compliance and complete understanding of the Local Rules, 8 the Court hereby ORDERS attorneys Leonard Stone, Adam Levitt, Kyle McGee, Patrick 9 Reilly, and Brian Anderson to file a certification with the Court no later than 12:00 p.m. on 10 December 19, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-1 and 11 26-4. Counsel are advised that similar violations in the future may result in the imposition 12 of sanctions. 13 DATED: December 17, 2014 14 15 16 17 NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?